Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Developers can now submit apps to ChatGPT

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

121–130 of 137 posts

Re: Developers can now submit apps to ChatGPT

#121

Post by vmazi »

simianwords wrote: post #67

I have a specific prediction made that I want to document here. There will come a new UI framework/protocol, maybe something over HTML/CSS/JS that works within a chat ui context for such ChatGPT (or other llm) integrations. For example, if you have an ecommerce app or website and want to integrate it with ChatGPT then you will have to develop on the new UI primitives. The primitives might include carousels, lists, ta…

https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2025-11-21-mcp-ap...

It’s going to be built into MCP and will be supported by Anthropic and OpenAI or anyone else that supports this mcp spec

Re: Developers can now submit apps to ChatGPT

#122

Post by simianwords »

WhyOhWhyQ wrote: post #118
simianwords wrote: post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People like ChatGPT even if you don’t.

And..? People also hate ChatGPT even if you don't. Do you think everyone in the world thinks exactly the same way as you do or something? Some people actually enjoy exerting their talents to create things.

That’s the good part! Sam Altman provides ChatGPT for people who like it

Re: Developers can now submit apps to ChatGPT

#123

Post by WhyOhWhyQ »

simianwords wrote: post #122
WhyOhWhyQ wrote: post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And..? People also hate ChatGPT even if you don't. Do you think everyone in the world thinks exactly the same way as you do or something? Some people actually enjoy exerting their talents to create things.

That’s the good part! Sam Altman provides ChatGPT for people who like it

Sam Altman provides ChatGPT for everybody. You seem not to be reading what I've written.

Re: Developers can now submit apps to ChatGPT

#124

Post by WhyOhWhyQ »

mickael-kerjean wrote: post #66
WhyOhWhyQ wrote: post #52

What's the benefit in giving free labor to Sam Ctrlman beyond what he's already extracted? And are they just going to steal whatever good apps get submitted?

The benefit is "Distribution". If your users are there, you want to address them wherever they already are, this is why apple store / play store / amazon store ... are so popular. Becoming a platform / ecosystem is the common playbook to go from being a one product company to an ecosystem / platform worth a lot more

Can a small business succeed in that game?

Re: Developers can now submit apps to ChatGPT

#126

Post by tacitusarc »

measurablefunc wrote: post #75
tacitusarc wrote: post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think maybe you mean something else when you say MoE. I interpret that as “Mixture of Experts” which is a model type where there is a routing matrix applied per layer to sort of generate the matmul executed on that layer. The experts are the weight columns that are selected, but calling them experts kinda muddies the waters IMO, it’s really just a sparsification strategy. Using that MoE you almost certainly would g…

Here you go: https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsOSxbMCwxLCJcXHRleHR7cXVlcnkgffCfp...

OK that’s what I figured you meant. FWIW, MoE as a term of art means something different, what I described. It’s internal to a single model, part of the logit generation process.

Re: Developers can now submit apps to ChatGPT

#127

Post by brandonb »

degamad wrote: post #4

2024's GPT Store, killed 6 months ago, is back? https://openai.com/index/introducing-the-gpt-store/

This is a little different since the Apps SDK lets developers create specialized tool calls to their servers, and create specialized in-chat UI components. It's an evolution of the same concept as the GPT store, but a very different take on the idea.

Re: Developers can now submit apps to ChatGPT

#128

Post by measurablefunc »

tacitusarc wrote: post #126
measurablefunc wrote: post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here you go: https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsOSxbMCwxLCJcXHRleHR7cXVlcnkgffCfp...

OK that’s what I figured you meant. FWIW, MoE as a term of art means something different, what I described. It’s internal to a single model, part of the logit generation process.

That's fine, you can pretend my entire diagram is one NN, end result will still be the same whether you put it all inside one box or break it out into many.
Post reply on HN