Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT Image 1.5

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

121–130 of 272 posts

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#121

Post by KaiserPro »

mnorris wrote: post #115
KaiserPro wrote: post #59

Is there a watermarking, or some other way for normal people to tell if its fake?

I ran exiftool on an image I just generated: $ exiftool chatgpt_image.png ... Actions Software Agent Name : GPT-4o Actions Digital Source Type : http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgori... Name : jumbf manifest Alg : sha256 Hash : (Binary data 32 bytes, use -b option to extract) Pad : (Binary data 8 bytes, use -b option to extract) Claim Generator Info Name : ChatGPT ...

Exif isn't all that robust though.

I suppose I'm going to have to bite the bullet and actually train an AI detector that works roughly in real time.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#122

Post by 101008 »

agentifysh wrote: post #84

I am very impressed a benchmark I like to run is have it create sprite maps, uv texture maps for an imagined 3d model Noticed it captured a megaman legends vibe .... https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001037332770615302 and here it generated a texture map from a 3d character https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001038516067672390/photo/1 however im not sure if these are true uv maps that is accurate as i dont have the 3d m…

> however im not sure if these are true uv maps that is accurate as i dont have the 3d models itself

also in the tweet

> GPT Image 1.5 is **ing crazy

and

> holy shit lol

what's impressive if you don't know if it's right or not (as the other comment pointed out, it is not right)

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#124

Post by efilife »

sharkjacobs wrote: post #8

Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?

I'm guessing that it was intentional all along, as no other models exhibit this behavior. It was so it could be instantly recognized as ChatGPT

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#125

Post by 999900000999 »

oxag3n wrote: post #46

If this was a farm of sweatshop Photoshopers in 2010, who download all images from the internet and provide a service of combining them on your request, this would escalate pretty quickly. Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected? Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I…

A middle ground would be Chat GPT at least providing attribution.

Back in reality, you can get in line to sue. Since they have more money than you, you can't really win though.

So it goes.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#126

Post by ge96 »

I get the tech implementation is amazing, I wonder if it takes away from genuineness of events, like the Astronaut photo, I get it's just a joke/funny too but it's like a photo of you in a supercar vs. actually buying one. Or fake AI companions vs. real people. Beauty filters/skinny filters vs. actually being healthy.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#127

Post by agentifysh »

gs17 wrote: post #104
agentifysh wrote: post #84

I am very impressed a benchmark I like to run is have it create sprite maps, uv texture maps for an imagined 3d model Noticed it captured a megaman legends vibe .... https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001037332770615302 and here it generated a texture map from a 3d character https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001038516067672390/photo/1 however im not sure if these are true uv maps that is accurate as i dont have the 3d m…

> however im not sure if these are true uv maps I can tell you with 100% certainty they are not. For example, Crash doesn't have a backside for his torso. You could definitely make a model that uses these as textures, but you'd really have to force it and a lot of it would be stretched or look weird. If you want to go this approach, it would make a lot more sense to make a model, unwrap it, and use the wireframe UV m…

yeah definitely impressive compared to what nano banana outputted

tried your suggested approach by unwrapaped wireframe uv as input and im impressed

https://x.com/AgentifySH/status/2001057153235222867

obviously its not going to be accurate 1:1 but with more 3d spatial awareness i think it could definitely improve

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#128

Post by laurent123456 »

KaiserPro wrote: post #59

Is there a watermarking, or some other way for normal people to tell if its fake?

There are ways to tell if an image is real, if it's been signed cryptographically by the camera for example, but increasingly it probably won't be possible to tell if something is fake. Even if there's some kind of hidden watermark embedded in the pixels, you can process it with img2img in another tool and get rid of the watermark. Exif data, etc is irrelevant, you can get rid of it easily or fake it.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#129

Post by cheema33 »

wahnfrieden wrote: post #54
czhu12 wrote: post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Haven’t their prices stayed at $20/m for a while now?

They've published anticipated price increases over coming years. Prices will rise dramatically and steadily to meet revenue targets.

AI doesn’t have much of a moat. People can and will easily switch providers.
Post reply on HN