121–130 of 363 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is not a meaningful metric given that we don't live in 1996 and neither do our web standards.
The parent comment is a reference to a different story that was on the HN home page yesterday where someone attempted that with Claude.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Claude Code has absolutely zero features that help me review code or do anything else than vibe-coding and accept changes as they come in. We need diff-comparisons between different executions, tailored TUI for that kind of work and more. Claude Code is basically a MVP of that. Still, I do use Claude Code and Codex daily as there is nothing better out there currently. But they still feel tailored towards vibe-coding…
I really do not want those things in Claude COde - I much prefer choosing my own diff tools etc. and running them in a separate terminal. If they start stuffing too much into the TUI they'd ruin it - if you want all that stuff built in, they have the VS Code integration.
Just added it to our inventory. For those of you using Nix: nix run github:numtide/llm-agents.nix#mistral-vibe The repo is updated daily.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
but can it recreate the spacejam 1996 website? https://www.spacejam.com/1996/jam.html
That is not a meaningful metric given that we don't live in 1996 and neither do our web standards.
Look interesting, eager to play around with it! Devstral was a neat model when it released and one of the better ones to run locally for agentic coding. Nowadays I mostly use GPT-OSS-120b for this, so gonna be interesting to see if Devstral 2 can replace it. I'm a bit saddened by the name of the CLI tool, which to me implies the intended usage. "Vibe-coding" is a fun exercise to realize where models go wrong, but for…
> run locally for agentic coding. Nowadays I mostly use GPT-OSS-120b for this What kind of hardware do you have to be able to run a performant GPT-OSS-120b locally?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So people have different definitions of the word, but originally Vibe Coding meant "don't even look at the code". If you're actually making sure it's legit, it's not vibe coding anymore. It's just... Backseat Coding? ;) There's a level below that I call Power Coding (like power armor) where you're using a very fast model interactively to make many very small edits. So you're still doing the conceptual work of program…
> If you're actually making sure it's legit, it's not vibe coding anymore. sorry to disappoint you but that is also been considered vibecoding. It is just not pejorative.
Imo, if you read the code, it's no longer vibecoding.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But where are the professional tools, meant to be used for people who don't want to do vibe-coding, but be heavily assisted by LLMs? Something that is meant to augment the human intellect, not replace it? Claude Code not good enough for ya?
Claude Code has absolutely zero features that help me review code or do anything else than vibe-coding and accept changes as they come in. We need diff-comparisons between different executions, tailored TUI for that kind of work and more. Claude Code is basically a MVP of that. Still, I do use Claude Code and Codex daily as there is nothing better out there currently. But they still feel tailored towards vibe-coding…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In what year was it meaningful to have pelicans riding bicycles?
SVG is a current standard. Do not be coy just to satisfy your urge to disagree.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
no, “No True Scotsman” is just about people not categories like open source
Good job missing the point. Though given the stance you are taking in this conversation, I'm not surprised you want to quibble over that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯