Earlier quoted context omitted.
I want to be able to write code in an editor or IDE and push that to source control from the device.
You can do that. As long as you're okay with VSCode or a very specific build Vim: https://docs.blink.sh/advanced/code Please don't move the goal post to "I also want to compile and run code" because I got nothing for that. I just ssh to my home server and use my normal shell and neovim there.
iPad Pro with M5 chip
121–130 of 288 posts
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#122I have a 2018 iPad Pro that is due for replacement but I cannot bring myself to spend the money on a new iPad. No matter how much I think I'll use it, it becomes a web browsing and YouTube machine on the couch. It's a shame because I think the hardware design is quite good, but the OS itself is so limiting, even with the "improvements" iPadOS 26 introduced.
> it becomes a web browsing and YouTube machine on the couch My 4090 and m4 iPad Pro share this fate, with some occasional gaming.
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Every iPad I've bought was going to be "the one where I find a use case that uses it" but every time it ends up being a YouTube machine.
iOS doesn't even make for a very good YouTube machine, you need uBlock Origin for that.
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah those are things most people want on an iPad with 6GB RAM…
My first computer had 48 KB, 6 GB are a lot when not juggling Electron processes.
6GB is not plenty when you are expected to run an IDE and in the case of Android an emulator that is also emulating a phone with 4GB+ RAM.
iOS development has never used an “emulator”, when you ran in the simulator even on x86 computers, it compiled your code to x86 and ran against an x86 version of the iOS framework.
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#125I get the impression they're trying to market this to laptop users. I'm still very skeptical of iPads as a productivity device. The problem isn't the hardware, it's the OS, the app store and the model for selling apps. Apple's app store policies make it hard to sell expensive software (which most productivity apps are somewhat expensive), it also makes it hard to distribute free software (as in open source -- because…
My sister in law has used an iPad as here primary compute device for school. Frankly, it works absolutely fine for her. 95% of her need is reading, email, and writing papers (in Google Drive).
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#126I get the impression they're trying to market this to laptop users. I'm still very skeptical of iPads as a productivity device. The problem isn't the hardware, it's the OS, the app store and the model for selling apps. Apple's app store policies make it hard to sell expensive software (which most productivity apps are somewhat expensive), it also makes it hard to distribute free software (as in open source -- because…
My sister in law has used an iPad as here primary compute device for school. Frankly, it works absolutely fine for her. 95% of her need is reading, email, and writing papers (in Google Drive).
If you use one program at a time, do not need an actual file system, have no need to install software from a variety of places (Github, Vendor sites, etc), have no problem installing multiple "apps" that only work behind paywalls or not at all and you don't care about replacing a functional device whenever Apple obsoletes it... iOS is the best thing since sliced bread.
If you need anything outside of iOS's limited list of abilities, its a trash operating system that has crippled amazing hardware.
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a whole spectrum of use cases between artist and software developer. Honestly most people that I see at work just use Office software, web browser, and Teams.
Office is a great use for a $350 regular iPad. Honestly the same one I'd recommend to developers, or worst case an $800 iPad Air for the 13" screen size. The $1000+ iPad Pro isn't helpful for any of that.
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#128I have a 2018 iPad Pro that is due for replacement but I cannot bring myself to spend the money on a new iPad. No matter how much I think I'll use it, it becomes a web browsing and YouTube machine on the couch. It's a shame because I think the hardware design is quite good, but the OS itself is so limiting, even with the "improvements" iPadOS 26 introduced.
I follow largely the same path. I basically find that mine ends up used for only two things: 1. Reading technical papers where I use the pen to make notes 2. Sketching household projects (a few of the apps are very nice for this). Outside of that, I simply want a real, physical keyboard most of the time.
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#129I currently have an m1 iPad pro, and I use it daily. Do I get the pro performance out of it? Probably not. I might still upgrade to the m5 for the better display though. These are my use-cases FWIW: - Goodnotes w/ the apple pen during work - YouTube during dinner - Kindle App for technical books (and regular Kindle device for fiction) - Browsing the internet - Streaming games with Xbox streaming I travel for work one…
Re: iPad Pro with M5 chip
#130I get the impression they're trying to market this to laptop users. I'm still very skeptical of iPads as a productivity device. The problem isn't the hardware, it's the OS, the app store and the model for selling apps. Apple's app store policies make it hard to sell expensive software (which most productivity apps are somewhat expensive), it also makes it hard to distribute free software (as in open source -- because…
My sister in law has used an iPad as here primary compute device for school. Frankly, it works absolutely fine for her. 95% of her need is reading, email, and writing papers (in Google Drive).
Sure, it's great for that kind of (computationally) light work, but then what's the point of putting a monster like the M5 chip in it?