Earlier quoted context omitted.
> [Elimination of] Automatic Refunds for Cancellations Airline cancellations. Seeing as they're talking about making a change, I assume it's airline cancellations, since no airline will currently refund you for a passenger cancellation.
Southwest used to for all tickets, for free. They’re eliminating it because the new CEO is trying to speed-run them out of business.
US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
121–130 of 678 posts
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
If you drove your car across 17 countries in Europe would you expect to pay the same at every station you come across? I don't think what you're saying is even the norm within European countries, is it?
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
If you drove your car across 17 countries in Europe would you expect to pay the same at every station you come across? I don't think what you're saying is even the norm within European countries, is it?
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
$99 recline your seat fee
I'd pay $99 so that the person in front of me *can't* recline their seat
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#125Ironically in Europe we have some decent regulation for airlines, but the public train operating companies refuse to do the same for trains. We need to have some of those same protection and transparency requirements for train companies as well. But the governments of the big operating companies have vetoed this so far. Sometimes deregulation actually makes it easier to implement regulation.
Train operators aren't as strictly regulated because they can't do as much harm, both in terms of the inherent catastraophic consequences of air travel disasters for passengers and bystanders, and in terms of the financial risk that passengers take on by purchasing a ticket. A no-refunds-for-cancellations policy on a $100 intercity train ticket that rarely ever cancels hits different from a $400 flight itinerary that…
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#126I'd be curious to see how the all-in price of airline tickets has evolved in recent decades. It feels like it's now commonplace to have hundreds of dollars in additional fees for things like legroom. That means a cheap ticket is a midrange ticket and a midrange ticket can end up being quite expensive unless you fall for the "we get to strap you behind the bathroom with only the clothes on your back" Saver ticket. It…
Related to that; I am curious in what airlines think they will get or what motivates them to prioritize being deceptive, sneaky, dishonest, manipulative, lying, con-artists, i.e., just abusive all around? If everyone is required to provide "all in pricing" then there is no competitive advantage in being a bigger, better fraud; so must it be concluded that they think they have a competitive advantage at being the bett…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bmGff5f-Ug
(They are available from all the usual podcast places, but it just happens that the youtube mirror is the easiest way I know to link a specific episode.)
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#127[flagged]
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
The rest of the world's already discovered an easy out: negotiate by promising to do what you've already been doing for the past decade. As long as he hasn't been fed some idea to fixate on, he's an easy mark that can be placated by literally anything.
South Korea had to publicly come out and say they wanted to accept Trump's deal, but it had to have some concessions or else they would go into economic collapse!
And the EU just allowed something like 30% more access from USA food which was previously considered not fit for human consumption under their health laws right? Please correct my figures if they're wrong.
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hundreds of dollars for legroom? Are you... sure? For what kind of flights?
One example: Chicago to New York on United, direct flight that is ~2.5 hours. $209 for economy and $381 for Economy Plus. This is a $172 difference.
Re: US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees
#130This one is wild. You want to sit next to somebody's crying 2 year old? Go nuts. Change their diaper while you're at it.