121–124 of 124 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Hiring juniors, while good for the industry in the long run, doesn't really benefit an individual company If this is really a concern, require a long-term employment contract from incoming candidates.
Unethical bullshit, but sure
There are tradeoffs and you'd do well to acknowledge agency in this world.
This could be the next iteration of stealing talent to prevent others from owning the market. An actually intelligent investor could dominate by bucking the trend and hire lots of smart, eager junior candidates. When other tech companies realize GenAI will never produce what they want, there will be a rush to re-hire developers. Top talent all started as junior talent. Grab that pool so nobody else will have it.
> GenAI will never produce what they want What's your argument supporting this? Ten years ago GenAI couldn't produce two coherent sentences. We've come a long way, what makes you think it won't go further?
Depending on the question, it still can't.
It's kinda crazy how you view repeating probabilistic outputs as "coherent sentences".
> We've come a long way, what makes you think it won't go further?
Where did I say it won't go further? I said it will never produce what they want.
Those are different things.
Regardless, you're focused on the wrong point.