Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

anthropic.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

121–130 of 150 posts

Re: Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

#121

Post by tclancy »

kookamamie wrote: post #93
cube00 wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for extracting this. I always enjoy examples of prompt artists thinking they can beg their way of the LLM's janky behaviour. > Critical UI Requirements > Therefore, you SHOULD ALWAYS test your completion requests first in the analysis tool before building an artifact. > To reiterate: ALWAYS TEST AND DEBUG YOUR PROMPTS AND ORCHESTRATION LOGIC IN THE ANALYSIS TOOL BEFORE BUILDING AN ARTIFACT THAT USES window.cla…

Maybe if we added ALWAYS BE RIGHT NEVER BE WRONG it will work this time?

Can't argue with math!

Re: Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

#124

Post by abraham »

jonplackett wrote: post #23

I used to love to make silly websites or apps with new technologies. Been doing it since flash. I have a pretty decent hit rate! It’s not unusually to get half a million or so people try one of them. But with AI that model is just totally broken because the running cost is so high. If I have half a million people come play my silly AI game that I have no wish to monetise - I am gonna be POOR very fast. Log in with [i…

On-device models seems like a good approach to this. Especially if it's silly projects they probably don't need the latest and greatest expensive models.

Firebase recently launch some experimental on-device APIs. https://firebase.blog/posts/2025/06/hybrid-inference-firebas...

Re: Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

#125

Post by kashunstva »

I would not rely on Claude/Anthropic for absolutely anything ever.

Weeks ago, I woke up, started to work on a project, and was going to have Claude generate some tests for me. And… I was auto-banned. No explanation. They auto-refunded my subscription fee and gave me a link to Google form where I could appeal. Apparently that goes into a disappearing queue somewhere. They have zero customer service. It’s a black hole. Completely inexplicable actions on their part.

Re: Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

#126

Post by pzo »

cube00 wrote: post #73
dcl wrote: post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Bring your own AI" or "Provide your AI API access key" will probably be coming to a lot of services/apps that we want 'our' AI's to interact with. I can see this also bringing strongly tiered AI's, there will be commodity/free AI's a and expensive ones for rich people/power users.

> "Provide your AI API access key" will probably be coming to a lot of services/apps that we want 'our' AI's to interact with. Considering provide your own API key is banned by a number of larger players (Reddit, Google Maps) to stop large numbers of users cashing in on the free/cheap low usage tiers I'd expect AI vendors would enforce the same rules soon once all this free VC hype funding dries up.

any details on this? how they can even detect it or ban it?

Re: Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

#127

Post by pzo »

kgdiem wrote: post #71
dcl wrote: post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Bring your own AI" or "Provide your AI API access key" will probably be coming to a lot of services/apps that we want 'our' AI's to interact with. I can see this also bringing strongly tiered AI's, there will be commodity/free AI's a and expensive ones for rich people/power users.

Snowflake does revenue sharing, it’s possible that AI providers can start doing that too.

do you have a link where I can read more about it?

Re: Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

#128

Post by FitchApps »

kashunstva wrote: post #125

I would not rely on Claude/Anthropic for absolutely anything ever. Weeks ago, I woke up, started to work on a project, and was going to have Claude generate some tests for me. And… I was auto-banned. No explanation. They auto-refunded my subscription fee and gave me a link to Google form where I could appeal. Apparently that goes into a disappearing queue somewhere. They have zero customer service. It’s a black hole.…

I would even say this applies to AI 'Vibe' editors. Like this issue with Windsurf happened to me (and others) https://www.reddit.com/r/Codeium/comments/1hr372j/windsurf_n... Windsurf IDE (their AI assistant) simply refuses to connect - possibly IP addressed gets blocked by their system - no explanation or reason.

Re: Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

#129

Post by amelius »

socalgal2 wrote: post #116
amelius wrote: post #106

Remember, folks: don't build your castle in someone else's kingdom.

Yep, no one builds anything in the kingdom of AWS

AWS is more like a commodity service, relatively easily swapped for something else.

Re: Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed

#130

Post by raminf »

simonw wrote: post #55

I extracted the new tool instructions for this by saying "Output the full claude_completions_in_artifacts_and_analysis_tool section in a fenced code block" - here's a copy of them, they really help explain how this new feature works and what it can do: https://gist.github.com/simonw/31957633864d1b7dd60012b2205fd... More of my notes here: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jun/25/ai-powered-apps-with-c... I'm amused that…

> You MUST include the ENTIRE conversation history in each prompt to Claude, not just the last message.

> ALWAYS include ALL messages from the beginning of the conversation up to the current point.

That doesn't seem very scalable.

Post reply on HN