Live data from Hacker News

Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

nytimes.com

121–130 of 167 posts

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#121
post #64

I was a big enough believer in crypto to literally start a company in this space only to leave it completely disenchanted and deeply pessimistic about the direction of the industry. I felt that there were many real legal and regulatory challenges that governments just didn't want to deal with. No government wants to enable money laundering, black markets, corruption and terrorism; or so I thought! Now we're in a situ…

> This is a big lesson for everyone about why some degree of regulation is necessary.

I really wonder how you come up to that conclusion especially that there is more than a degree of regulation. If regulation will not apply for the top anyway, then it's better to remove all regulation.

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What were their roles in the Biden Administration?

Recipients of nepotistic pardons, which is what people find suspicious.

He was pardoned because Biden knows that Trump is going to just make up some excuse to go after his family.

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#123
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This just isn’t true, it is easy to find blatant corruption tied to politicians at all levels from both parties. Look at California, New York, Chicago, and Baltimore, look at the Biden family, the Clintons, Nancy Pelosi, Letitia James, the Democrats are just as corrupt, the mainstream media just reports on it less.

hahahha you just named a bunch of people with no criminal charges. That's it? hahaha

I don't agree with them but tons of known corrupt Republicans have not been criminally charged. That means nothing.

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#124
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Politics-related threads are generally the worst on HN, and if we're going to have them, people need to take extra care to follow the guidelines. In particular, we don't want HN to be a place where it's normal to attack people for their class or intellect.

[deleted]

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#125
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many people disagree with the Covid response. Many people look at the Bidens’ relationship with Ukraine and wonder whether the war could have been avoided, and we wouldn’t have to hear stories about “we sent $X billions, but Zelenskyy says he received only $0.5X billions” which could have been spent here, not to mention millions of lives spared (the latter doesn’t affect ordinary Americans directly, but there you go)…

> Many people disagree with the Covid response. Who was president in 2020? Who did the first round of stimulus?

People who disagree with the Covid response may have been voting for RFK as much as Trump.

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#126
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can’t see why average Americans would want a change from many of the Biden Administration’s policies? It has nothing to do with racism, xenophobia, or transphobia. A lot of the policies were just objectively bad for average everyday Americans.

Can you give some examples of policies that were bad for ordinary, everyday Americans?

Honestly, no. Biden was a really terrible president by any metric except for "isTrump? yes/no". To be fair though, he excelled on that one pretty consistently throughout his term

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#127
post #46

The amount of corruption and incompetence ignored by his base is staggering. This is all because they don’t like immigration?

No, the current system does not work for most of the people hence the "just nuke it" option sounds like a rational one. Canadian elections show that people can change their mind overnight, but unfortunately some of the changes that happened in the US institutions and the global relations will take decades to reverse (if ever).

The Canadian elections are structurally different though. Not everybody changed their mind, the Conservatives won more seats than before. What happened was that Bloc Quebecois and NDP voters broke ranks to vote in a Liberal MP for their riding, to block what seemed like a surefire supermajority for the Conservatives. This is possible when you don't have a 2-party system with deeply calcified divisions.

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#128

Interesting. I thought you could do this in the open: https://www.theverge.com/news/646426/a-1-million-per-head-di... Is the Sovereign Bitcoin Fund bailout scam still on the table or is Bitcoin doing well enough so that it isn't needed any longer?

IIRC this was an available bet on Polymarket, where bitcoiners kept insisting it already happened, ever since the executive order was issued, but that's crypto folks for you. (I didn't look up how and whether that resolved)

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The thing is though, once you regulate crypto then what’s the point? You are left with a highly inefficient/expensive and immutable database. Bitcoin solves (or attempts to solve) for exchange in absence of trust and regulation. But this is a stupid thing to solve for, because without trust and regulation you can’t even have a functioning society.

I would actually say that scams and financial crimes seem to be the only concrete use case of the technology at the moment. (Unless you count speculation/gambling).

Illegal Internet stuff in general is an application of Bitcoin. That includes money laundering, drugs, porn (in communist places like Texas), etc.

Apparently before Bitcoin was Liberty Reserve, which was a centralized database.

Re: Secret Deals, Foreign Investments: The Rise of Trump’s Crypto Firm

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would actually say that scams and financial crimes seem to be the only concrete use case of the technology at the moment. (Unless you count speculation/gambling).

> scams and financial crimes seem to be the only concrete use case of the technology the technology is showing transactions on a public ledger literally (unlike tradfi), nobody is hiding anything (until we go to Monero and similar, but that's different). What's however happening, and we come back to the first point, is the lack of "rules" so that in effect financial "crime" is legal.

the technology is showing transactions on a public ledger literally

There's a public ledger I can visit to see who's bribing Trump this week?

Post reply on HN