Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the software to watermark is widely available (as it appears to be) then an adversary has all they need to corrupt any existing watermark. These steganographic watermarks depend on no knowledge of the process. If the method is particularly ingenious (one of the inputs is centrally stored entropy which the extractor references by trialing them all) then knowledge of the process alone may not be sufficient to obtain…
> If you obtain two or more copies of the decrypted content you will be able to diff them and work out what you need to corrupt even without knowledge of the watermarking process. By the time you've destroyed enough of the signal to remove the watermark, the content is unwatchable.
How encryption for Cinema Movies works
121–124 of 124 posts
Re: How encryption for Cinema Movies works
#122> 31. May 2024 I’m trying to understand the timeline here; the article was originally written last year and the latest spec is also from 2024 but the article has a link to this HN thread created yesterday?
Maybe the author saw a bunch of hits coming from HN and edited his post to add the link to the discussion? It doesn't seem as if the author themselves posted their article.
Changelog: https://github.com/perryflynn/serverless.industries/commits/...
Re: How encryption for Cinema Movies works
#123Re: How encryption for Cinema Movies works
#124Maybe someone with more knowledge could comment on what happened here: https://wikileaks.org/sony/docs/05/docs/Digital%20Cinema/Dig...
This is one reason why they use Device lists, if such a issue becomes public, they will just block this specific projector or the whole product line for future movie releases and the leak is contained.
Also only movies which got assigned to that projection system are affected. So the damage is low/medium.