Live data from Hacker News

Self hosted FLOSS fitness/workout tracker

github.com

121–123 of 123 posts

Re: Self hosted FLOSS fitness/workout tracker

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They absolutely do NOT mean the same thing. There is open source software that requires payment to obtain. There is open source software that you are not free to do whatever you want with (non-libre) There is software available at no cost which is neither open source or libre. Just about every permutation of these 3 concepts has some actual example in the real world. Please do not promote the idea that they are in an…

What is an example of open source software that is not libre? Like the other commenter said, the F in F(L)OSS does mean free as in speech, not necessarily free as in beer.

The “NASA Open Source Agreement 1.3” is an Open Source license that is not a Free Software license (hence not Libre).

Re: Self hosted FLOSS fitness/workout tracker

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is absolutely not the history I have lived through.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/floss-and-foss.en.html Stallman wants people to say FLOSS to denote free software versus open source software, and my interpretation of this article is that he only deems the GNU licenses to be truly free (libre) software.

> [..] only deems the GNU licenses to be truly free (libre) software.

Simply has never been the case.

Re: Self hosted FLOSS fitness/workout tracker

#123
post #28
post #18

Are there any privacy-friendly wearables in the fitness tech scene? It seems like most wearable gadgets send data to remote servers, whenever possible.

Most Garmin watches _can_ work without connecting to your phone and the app. It just stores the files locally on the watch and you can just connect it to your PC and read the files.

Please let me know if you know of any options to streamline the process.
Post reply on HN