Live data from Hacker News

I still like Sublime Text

ohdoylerules.com

121–130 of 620 posts

Re: I still like Sublime Text

#124

Sublime Text developer here, thank you for all the praise! I'm looking forward to what we can accomplish this year. If you have any questions I'd be happy to answer.

I think a big hit for ST's popularity - next to the rise of Atom and VS Code - was its upgrade from version 3 to 4; are you considering to do that again or, if funds are required, do a different way to raise money?

With the new licensing model we no longer need to hold back changes and do major releases. Avoiding the big pause in updates was partly why it was changed.

Re: I still like Sublime Text

#125
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a Sublime user I mostly agree, except for the project stuff. I can never bring myself to set that up. What are you using multiple LSP servers per file for?

If you have any in-lined code, SQL/HTML. I can see that being a great feature. My eyes widened at that part of the article, as I have to betray syntax highlighting when I in-line something, which makes me want to break it into it's own file to get the highlighting back. But for simple things (like one-liners); breaking it into its own file makes things even more messy.

Hmm, so while it's not LSP I do have a Markdown plugin that highlights code blocks. But I don't rely on autocomplete there.

Re: I still like Sublime Text

#126

I mean, there's nothing wrong with it. I personally use Eclipse, BBEdit and KATE in 2025, and love them. Sublime is one of the tools which really grown and aged well, so it deserves the love it gets. I personally don't let anybody to tell me which tool to use. It's rude to mock and belittle the tools people use.

AFAIU, Sublime Text and Kate (my editor of choice) are pretty similar in spirit, so when I read something nice about ST, I mentally insert "... and Kate". They are both snappy power editors, not IDEs, with LSP support.

Re: I still like Sublime Text

#127

I mean, there's nothing wrong with it. I personally use Eclipse, BBEdit and KATE in 2025, and love them. Sublime is one of the tools which really grown and aged well, so it deserves the love it gets. I personally don't let anybody to tell me which tool to use. It's rude to mock and belittle the tools people use.

AFAIU, Sublime Text and Kate (my editor of choice) are pretty similar in spirit, so when I read something nice about ST, I mentally insert "... and Kate". They are both snappy power editors, not IDEs, with LSP support.

Yes, KATE, ST and BBEdit (and VSCode) are "Code aware text editors". I use KATE and BBEdit for smaller project and Go mostly, and use Eclipse for the bigger stuff which needs its own "space" to be developed well and kept organized.

It's a "correct tool for the job at hand" situation for me.

Re: I still like Sublime Text

#128
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I often see downvotes when people criticise ST's pricing, but I mostly agree with the detractors - the price always seems to be just a few bucks over the magical limit I'd be willing to pay.

Tech workers often spend $100 or more on a fancy meal with friends in a single night—I've definitely done that more than once. So paying $100 for a software license that I’ll be using almost every hour of the workday, and even more when working on personal projects, feels like a bargain.

I do wonder why it is that way though, because you're right, I've balked at the cost of software before, but had no issue in spending an order of magnitude more money on a flight to SF to meet up with other developers.

Re: I still like Sublime Text

#130

Sublime rules. I started my career with Brackets, then Sublime, then Atom for a short while. Then switched to VS Code for a few years and just recently switched back to Sublime because of how slow VS Code became. Also great pricing! One time purchase for Sublime is still available in 2025!

[deleted]
Post reply on HN