121–130 of 421 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can sign up to be on the waiting list for a lucky Panda $2 note, with a nice red envelope and a serial number starting with '888'. I mean, it's a nice gesture, and maybe annoying the heck out of certain Presidents. The price for this $2 note + red envelope is >$10.
$10 is taking advantage.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not just me / the music videos I look up then, is it? I can't help but wonder if it's some kind of YT hive mind, bots, or Google's own algorithms pushing those comments to the top.
Seems like they just put the comments with the most likes at the top... stands to reason that more likes = nicer comment.
This was also around the time they removed the thumbs up/down count.
This was to prevent creator burnout; imagine if every video you put out had some snarky diss against you in the comments.
TIL there are $100,000 bills and they are illegal to possess https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_one-hundred-th...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's instagram. Slight tangent: the YouTube comments used to be famous for being a vile cesspit. Then Google changed something, and now they are full of positivity. Often too full.
And for songs, often (fake?) testimonies to people's emotional attachments to the song.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of people rely on the bills. You are completely out of touch with the people with your attempt to sabotage the printed currency.
Rely on what that couldn't be better served by $1 coins?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
reading the comments gave me a headache...
It's instagram. Slight tangent: the YouTube comments used to be famous for being a vile cesspit. Then Google changed something, and now they are full of positivity. Often too full.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
reading the comments gave me a headache...
Because they're doing what people do here so often - responding to the headline, not the 'article.' The headline and first sentence are outright lies. "...known for printing his own unique currency—$2 bills that he personally designs." Uh ... no? He doesn't print it, he didn't design it. "He doesn’t actually print official U.S. currency, which would be illegal. Instead, [he] purchases uncut sheets of $2 bills from th…
Steve Wozniak (the Apple cofounder) famously bought sheets of $2 bills, and had a printer perforate and gum them into pads. So he could literally tear off $2 bills, in front of people who might not even know it was real currency, to pay them. https://web.archive.org/web/20180311084811/http://archive.wo...
In today's stupefied America, it wouldn't be safe because the police will be called and the police escalate things into unnecessary violence. In the 60's through 80's it would've been fine, but not now.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of people rely on the bills. You are completely out of touch with the people with your attempt to sabotage the printed currency.
Rely on what that couldn't be better served by $1 coins?