Earlier quoted context omitted.
> As a person who has no idea what most of the agencies do "As a person who doesn't know anything about this, here are my ideas" is, er, one approach to things, I suppose (as someone else mentioned, you've just given the FBI a fleet of over 2,000 watercraft, which doesn't seem terribly sensible).
The FBI doesn’t need watercraft, just sell them off - this is too easy
Vivek Ramaswamy on X: "Will entire agencies be deleted? Answer: yes
121–124 of 124 posts
Re: Vivek Ramaswamy on X: "Will entire agencies be deleted? Answer: yes
#122Everybody who stayed home, and decided that they'd be fine with a Trump Presidency... this is your fault. I know your whole litany of excuses. Let them keep you warm, while the greater of two evils actually does the evils they said they were going to do.
Re: Vivek Ramaswamy on X: "Will entire agencies be deleted? Answer: yes
#123This looks horribly like failing to understand Chesterton's fence https://thoughtbot.com/blog/chestertons-fence The agencies were democratically put in place for a reason. Removing them with no public discussion of the original reasoning is deeply undemocratic. At the very least, someone thought that the cost of having them in place was less than the cost to society of not having them there. Has that changed?
Didn't a democracy vote in the people that are saying they want to remove some agencies? Isn't that also how the agencies came to be in the first place?
Re: Vivek Ramaswamy on X: "Will entire agencies be deleted? Answer: yes
#124I worry about cuts to departments that is on clean energy, EV, sustainability in general. (For thinking that Musk is in that industry so it wouldn't happen, there's consideration that cuts on Govt support in that area will actually benefit the one that's ahead.. that's Tesla for the charging network, the EV sales, the peaker plant replacements, etc.)