Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I have been tricked into working to contribute training data so that they can profit off my labor You were playing a game without paying for it. How did you imagine they were making money without pimping your data?
Niantic made 700 million dollars last year, mostly selling virtual game items.
Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
121–130 of 365 posts
Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I have been tricked into working to contribute training data so that they can profit off my labor You were playing a game without paying for it. How did you imagine they were making money without pimping your data?
Niantic made 700 million dollars last year, mostly selling virtual game items.
Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
#123This is pretty cool, but I feel as a pokehunter (Pokemon Go player), I have been tricked into working to contribute training data so that they can profit off my labor. How? They consistently incentivize you to scan pokestops (physical locations) through "research tasks" and give you some useful items as rewards. The effort is usually much more significant than what you get in return, so I have stopped doing it. It's…
If you enjoy the game, play the game. Don’t boycott/withhold because they figured out an additional use for data that didn’t previously exist.
Another way of viewing this: GoogleMaps is incredibly high quality mapping software with lots of extra features. It is mostly free (for the end user). If no one uses it, Google doesn’t collect the data and nobody can benefit from the analysis of the data (eg. Traffic and ETA on Google Maps)
There’s no reason to hold out for a company to pay you for your geolocation data because none of them offer that service.
Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
> All of which I've directly contributed to and never (directly) recieved anything in return To be fair, you received a service for free that you may have otherwise had to pay for. I'm not saying it's just, but to say you didn't get anything in return is disingenuous.
Agreed. I mostly meant that I'll never see the actual dataset that I contributed to. That's why I'd prefer to spend my time on things that I can see, like OpenStreetMap :)
Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
#125So that's why Pokemon was notoriously impactful on battery life. They were recording and uploading our videos the whole time?
Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
#126So that's why Pokemon was notoriously impactful on battery life. They were recording and uploading our videos the whole time?
Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
#127Don't quite understand the application of this?
Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
#128This is pretty cool, but I feel as a pokehunter (Pokemon Go player), I have been tricked into working to contribute training data so that they can profit off my labor. How? They consistently incentivize you to scan pokestops (physical locations) through "research tasks" and give you some useful items as rewards. The effort is usually much more significant than what you get in return, so I have stopped doing it. It's…
Honestly you should have assumed they were using the collected data for such a purpose. It would be shocking if they weren't doing this directly or selling the data to other companies to do this.
Re: Niantic plans a “Large Geospatial Model” trained on Pokémon Go player data
#129Don't quite understand the application of this?