Thank you to Bitwarden for relicensing a thing to Free/Open License! Unfortunately, I no longer recommend Bitwarden for normal people because the built-in password manager in Firefox is too good. But for anyone with more advance needs (or who doesn't trust a password manager built into a web browser, I always recommend Bitwarden because KeepassXC + syncing is way too difficult for normal people.
Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
121–130 of 381 posts
Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#122Thank you to Bitwarden for relicensing a thing to Free/Open License! Unfortunately, I no longer recommend Bitwarden for normal people because the built-in password manager in Firefox is too good. But for anyone with more advance needs (or who doesn't trust a password manager built into a web browser, I always recommend Bitwarden because KeepassXC + syncing is way too difficult for normal people.
Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#123What would be a good way to backup the passwords stored in Bitwarden? I am worried that someday suddenly bitwarden could stop working and I will lose access to all the stored passwords? Should I have a physical copy of all the passwords stored in a vault at home?
Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Password management is like exercise. Even when people say they understand the value and want to do it, they don't. Even if you implement it for them, if it's not something that slots perfectly into their existing routine, they're not going to do it. Thankfully passkeys are here.
It's fine, even bad password management is better than passkeys. Thankfully the incredible hype for passkeys has been dead for years now and people are starting to question it.
Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#125Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#126Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#127Can somebody ELI5?
AFAIK they went closed source the other day which triggered backlash and now they're opening back up.
Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#128Thank you to Bitwarden for relicensing a thing to Free/Open License! Unfortunately, I no longer recommend Bitwarden for normal people because the built-in password manager in Firefox is too good. But for anyone with more advance needs (or who doesn't trust a password manager built into a web browser, I always recommend Bitwarden because KeepassXC + syncing is way too difficult for normal people.
I'm glad that Bitwarden moved quickly to resolve this. At least for me, Firefox's password manager isn't really a replacement. Bitwarden is approved by my employer, self-hostable, and supports logins for the litany of apps across my browsers and mobile devices. Whether it's the mobile app, mobile website, or site in my browser, Bitwarden just works for the most part. It's also quite nice that Bitwarden can store arbi…
+1. I use my password manager (currently 1Password, but I have been looking at self-hosting Bitwarden/Vaultwarden) more for storing credit card information and security questions.
Most built-in password managers don't cut it on that front.
Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#129Thank you to Bitwarden for relicensing a thing to Free/Open License! Unfortunately, I no longer recommend Bitwarden for normal people because the built-in password manager in Firefox is too good. But for anyone with more advance needs (or who doesn't trust a password manager built into a web browser, I always recommend Bitwarden because KeepassXC + syncing is way too difficult for normal people.
Does it support sharing passwords with family members?
Re: Bitwarden SDK relicensed from proprietary to GPLv3
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can it store TOTPs and passkeys as well? These are two things encountered even by "regular people" more and more. Especially keeping passkeys platform-independent is a huge advantage, in my view.
There will always be different opinions, but my opinion is that storing your TOTPs in your password manager is at best a reduction in security because you're reducing your 2 factors down to 1 factor. If the password manager gets compromised (even phished! It needn't involve the password manager's servers getting hacked), then you gain nothing by having 2FA enabled. I would strongly advise using something like Aegis o…
It does obviously not protect against the scenario where someone is breaking into your password vault.
I tend to enable 2FA but conveniently save the token in the PW manager for relatively low equity stuff, just to make it less enticing for an attacker, but use hardware FIDO for everything actually important.