"Tesla says on its website its FSD software in on-road vehicles requires active driver supervision and does not make vehicles autonomous." Despite it being called "Full Self-Driving." Tesla should be sued out of existence.
[flagged]
US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
121–130 of 1001 posts
Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#122My Tesla routinely tries to kill me on absolutely normal California roads in normal sunny conditions, especially when there are cars parked on the side of the road (it often brakes thinking I'm about to crash into them, or even swerves into them thinking that's the "real" lane). Elon's Unsupervised FSD dreams are a good bit off. I do hope they happen though.
Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nuclear power adoption is the largest force to combat climate change.
Historically, hydro has prevented for more CO2 than nuclear by a wide margin. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/electricity-prod-source-s... Looking forward Nuclear isn’t moving the needle. Solar grew more in 2023 alone than nuclear has grown since 1995. Worse nuclear can’t ramp up significantly in the next decade simply due to construction bottlenecks. 40 years ago nuclear could have played a larger role, but we wa…
Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#124Will the review assess overall mortality of the vehicles compared to similar cars, and overall mortality while FSD is in use?
This is because "inattentive driving" is _rarely_ the cause of fatalities on the road. The winner there is, and probably always will be, Alcohol.
Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#125Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#126Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those numbers aren't all the fatalities associated with tesla cars; IE, you can't compare the 45K/year (roughly 1 per 100M miles driven) to the limited number of reports. What they are looking for is whether there are systematic issues with the design and implementation that make it unsafe.
Unsafe relative to what? Certainly not to normal human drivers in normal cars. Those are killing people left and right.
Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
On many roads if a deer jumps across the road at the wrong time there’s literally nothing you can do. You can’t always drive at 30mph on back country roads just because a deer might hop out at you.
World of difference between, 30, 40, 50 and 60. Feels like something I have noticed between west and east coast drivers. Latter really send it on country turns and just trust the road. West coast, particularly montana, when vision is reduced, speed slows down. Just too many animals or road obstacles (eg: rocks, planks of wood) to just trust the road.
Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#129I worked in 18 a wheeler automation unicorn. Never rode in one once for a reason.
I honestly think that's the _easier_ problem to solve by at least two orders of magnitude.
Re: US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it takes 3 months to approve where steel rocket falls you might as well give up iterating something as complex as FSD.
Drive it in larger and larger closed courses. Expand to neighboring areas with consent of the communities involved. Agree on limited conditions until enough data has been gathered to expand those conditions.