Live data from Hacker News

Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

theverge.com

121–130 of 607 posts

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, the review part I support. The revenue part is fucking horseshit.

I think it should all be circumventable. My phone, like my computer, should be able to install whatever code I damn well please.

If you want Android, you know where you can find it.

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#122
post #6

Wait, so the Google Play Store, which you can install alternatives to (F-Droid, Aurora, Amazon,...), and where you can easily install apps through other means (such as downloading an APK through your browser and running it from the file manager) is an illegal monopoly while the Apple App Store isn't? Well, I guess Google's market cap is only 2 trillion compared to Apple's 3 trillion, so I guess that's fair.

> is an illegal monopoly while the Apple App Store isn't? This lawsuit is focused on Google. It's existence or the facts conveyed within do not provide any cover to Apple. They don't prevent Apple from facing the same lawsuit or from being covered by the same judgement. Do you feel this way when we put a murderer away? I mean, "his murder was illegal, but yet, some people still get away with it?! What is this injusti…

> They don't prevent Apple from facing the same lawsuit or from being covered by the same judgement.

I thought Apple did face the same lawsuit, against the same plaintiff, and Apple won.

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#123
post #96

I've been pretty anti-google on this topic (and a long time fdroid-lover). but this ruling is nuts to me, particularly where it says google "must give rival third-party app stores access to the full catalog of Google Play apps" I don't think we are going to see a healthy competitive marketplace with 4 years of chaos where every app store has the same apps, there's no curation at all or incentive structure for stores…

> I don't think we are going to see a healthy competitive marketplace with 4 years of chaos where every app store has the same apps, there's no curation at all or incentive structure for stores to win over app listings, and app stores get created and destroyed at the whims of a random single person.

The horrors of free will and choice.

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#124
post #102
post #22

Epic's "First Run" program does all the things they got mad at Apple and Google about. You don't have to pay any license fees for Unreal Engine if you use Epic exclusively for payments. They give you 100% revshare for 6 months if you agree to not ship your game on any other app store. Let's not kid ourselves, Epic never cared about consumer choice or a fair playing field, they only want the ability to profit without…

List of extremely tired and boring things: - Not fully understanding something, but having an opinion about it, with no attempt to learn more. - "All companies are evil" yawn Next time, can you try a more exciting criticism of Epic? We've been going through these lawsuits for four years now, every easy original thought has been thought and poasted about, you need to think a bit harder for your next comment.

I also disagree with GP's post because you don't need to use any of Epic's software. At the same time, I don't think your response is in line with HN's guidelines and is unnecessary.

>Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#125
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> is an illegal monopoly while the Apple App Store isn't? This lawsuit is focused on Google. It's existence or the facts conveyed within do not provide any cover to Apple. They don't prevent Apple from facing the same lawsuit or from being covered by the same judgement. Do you feel this way when we put a murderer away? I mean, "his murder was illegal, but yet, some people still get away with it?! What is this injusti…

> Would that be more "fair?" Having the second ruling be consistent with the first? Following precedent? This is terrible for competition where two companies in the same market can live under different rules in the same jurisdiction. Apple's monopoly is effectively blessed now.

One is a Federal criminal case.

The other is a Civil damages case.

Their format, rulings, and outcomes are not comparable.

Nothing in the civil case precludes Apple from receiving a criminal complaint.

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#126
post #82
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe the right thing I wanted to refer to is unattended app updates, enabled for third party sideloaded stores only with Android 12 or so. Maybe 12 added it back after it was taken away at some earlier point?

I am an Android user for a long time (since Android 2.2) and used pretty much every version from then on. Google devices (from Nexus to Android One devices and now Pixels) pretty much always allowed unattended updates for a long time (you may be right about Android 12, my memory is fuzzy here). And I never remember having scary warnings for sideloaded apps, sure, Android made it more difficult to install them (by hav…

I think what people upthread are talking about is allowing third-party stores (like F-Droid) to do unattended updates. That has not been possible until recently. Up until Android 12 or so (possibly later), I had to manually approve it any time F-Droid wanted to update an app I'd installed through F-Droid itself.

Unlike with apps installed via the Play Store, which can update them without needing my manual approval.

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#127
post #6

Wait, so the Google Play Store, which you can install alternatives to (F-Droid, Aurora, Amazon,...), and where you can easily install apps through other means (such as downloading an APK through your browser and running it from the file manager) is an illegal monopoly while the Apple App Store isn't? Well, I guess Google's market cap is only 2 trillion compared to Apple's 3 trillion, so I guess that's fair.

I was under the impression the App Store was indeed ruled a monopoly and that Apple was going to be made to open up third party app stores?

Only in the EU. This court case is about the US, where Apple does not have to allow third-party app stores.

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#128

Soon we'll have the Verizon Appstore and the Spotify Appstore and the Zoom Appstore, the exclusive home for each app and their partners, each with it's own overlapping user tracking libraries and insecure payment methods, and no one can even tell them to do otherwise. Coming soon to iOS, too!

Do you have anything to prove your claim? Any precedent? Epic could already to their own Play Store, but they didn't/couldn't. Freaking Amazon had their app store and they failed. Samsung also has their own App Store and how many non-Samsung phones run it?

Streaming services

Re: Google must open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judge

#129
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and where you can easily install apps through other means When the lawsuit started, apps installed like this couldn't be automatically updated without going through the scare screens again manually.

Which scare screens? I've sideloaded on Android for nearly a decade now, and the only one I've seen is the reasonable warning about third-party app sources when enabling it for the first time.

There weren't scare screens, at least I don't remember any, but the upgrade flow was comically bad for apps installed outside of the Play Store.

Let's say you install 15 apps on F-Droid. Every time you want to upgrade your apps, you were forced to manually initiate, and then sit through, each app update as they're installed in the foreground. This was because of deliberate limitations in Android.

Whereas on the Play Store, you could hit one button to update all of your installed apps and the installations happened in the background.

I believe it was after Google was threatened with lawsuits that they modified Android to be less tedious when it comes to managing and upgrading apps outside of the Play Store.

Post reply on HN