Live data from Hacker News

Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

rijksmuseum.nl

121–130 of 153 posts

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#121
post #97

A colleague of mine made this very nice way to explore the (often) high resolution images from their collection: https://rijkscollection.net/ Highly recommended and easy to fall into a “rijkscollection hole” for a bit :)

This is really nice to use. Is this how this wing of the gallery actually looks?

No, it looks different from this.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#123
post #26

I worked at this museum a few decades ago on a contract job, it was cool to walk around among so much history. Though I never really could appreciate the "old masters" from the Dutch Golden Age. Their work was part art and part record-keeping for which nowadays we have photography and video. The subject of many of these works are stuffy rich people posing for the "family album". Artfully done yes but boring subjects…

> One of the things special to me about the night watch is that it's huge in real life which I never really appreciated before I saw it. In contrast, the Mona Lisa at the Louvre was disappointingly tiny. I had the same experience seeing a print of Hokusai’s Great Wave. For whatever reason it was built up in my mind as a huge piece, but in reality it’s the size of a standard sheet of paper.

Ukiyo-e had standard sizes, but none was larger than an A/2 piece of paper.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#124

I worked at this museum a few decades ago on a contract job, it was cool to walk around among so much history. Though I never really could appreciate the "old masters" from the Dutch Golden Age. Their work was part art and part record-keeping for which nowadays we have photography and video. The subject of many of these works are stuffy rich people posing for the "family album". Artfully done yes but boring subjects…

What I do like about those paintings is the techniques used: relief to give some parts more volume, simple strokes to portray glass or metal reflections, other kind of simple strokes for textiles. As you say, now we have photographs, but it amazes me how what they could do without that technology.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#125
post #97

A colleague of mine made this very nice way to explore the (often) high resolution images from their collection: https://rijkscollection.net/ Highly recommended and easy to fall into a “rijkscollection hole” for a bit :)

Technically it is an interesting project.

But anyone who has visited the museum will find it weird. It is very different. The building architecture is very different, there are thousands more works in the exposition, and the order of the works is very different, ...

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#126
post #100
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> One of the things special to me about the night watch is that it's huge in real life which I never really appreciated before I saw it. Famous art that's stunningly bigger in person than I expected: - The Raft of the Medusa (Géricault) - Guernica (Picasso) - The Hallucinogenic Toreador (Dalí) Cannot recommend seeing art in person enough. Aside from the scale, it's also impossible to fully capture color or translucen…

Napoleon Crossing the Alps Is also much bigger than I expected.

Have you seen Suvorov Crossing the Alps [1]?

[1] https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%85...

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#127
post #41
post #37

Shortly after the painting was completed it was cropped so that it would fit on the wall. See if you can guess which edge was the victim. Of the high resolution image itself... I teach painting and regularly use such images as teaching aids. I honesty belive that they have as much teaching value (or even more) than seeing the real thing. The details of paint applicationare magnificently clear in such images.

It was actually cropped on all 4 sides: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/operation-night-watch-1982...

Yes, but the left hand low was the largest and (in my opinion) the most noticeable. That being said the trim on the right makes the two right-most figures feel ‘wrong’ and the cropped bottom moves the central figure’s feet way too close to the edge.

The structure of the painting is very common: a central figure surrounded by a semi-circle of figures. For an early and clear example look at The Tribute Money by Masaccio. The crop on the left plays hell with this structure. It also moves the central figure maddeningly close to the middle. Rembrandt would never have voluntarily placed a figure in the middle of a multi-figure composition.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#128
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wikimedia has a slightly higher-res image more easily accessible: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Nightwatch_by_Re... (14,168 × 11,528 px)

Odd that the resolution differs. The source linked to from Wikimedia Commons is the same page at the museum's website as the one I linked to.

The color for the Wikimedia image looks way off on my computer. Is it possible that it's tagged with the wrong color profile?

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#129
post #126
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Napoleon Crossing the Alps Is also much bigger than I expected.

Have you seen Suvorov Crossing the Alps [1]? [1] https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%85...

No, but now I do.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#130
post #77
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> One of the things special to me about the night watch is that it's huge in real life which I never really appreciated before I saw it. Famous art that's stunningly bigger in person than I expected: - The Raft of the Medusa (Géricault) - Guernica (Picasso) - The Hallucinogenic Toreador (Dalí) Cannot recommend seeing art in person enough. Aside from the scale, it's also impossible to fully capture color or translucen…

And famous art that's much smaller in person than I expected: The Great Wave off Kanagawa by Hokusai. For such an epic image, it's only 25x37 cm / 10x14".

It’s carved wood — hard to scale up!
Post reply on HN