Congrats on the launch! > The core of what makes a good pilot isn’t stick and rudder skills; it’s good decision making and risk management. At best, this is only half of the story. What separates GA operations from airline operations in terms of safety is much more involved than that: - GA (Part 91) flight hours are not recorded so safety data can only be estimated - Part 91 incidents follow much less scrutiny than p…
> In practically every example so far in aviation, adding automation makes things harder, not easier.
While somewhat unsatisfying as an answer, I think the industry has done it wrong, exactly because the result was harder, not easier. the UI/UX of modern glass cockpits is incredibly unintuitive and difficult to use. It's extremely opaque as to what the system's actually doing, if much. And no one has truly tackled the core problem of stopping our less trained, less rigorous part 91 pilots from losing control of their airplanes.
We definitely recognize that this creates a new failure mode. However, we're address those failure modes with redundant systems and following the same engineering standards as commercial aircraft. Many of them fly pure fly-by-wire and rely on the probably of a total electrical failure to be extremely low. We are doing the same.
If everything really does fail, there's the full airframe parachute to bring the airplane to the ground as a final layer of safety