If the end goal is portability for C, would Cosmopolitan Libc be a better choice because it supports a lot more features and probably runs faster?
I cant run cosmolibc on Android, for example. Then again this converter is somewhat limited and didn't accept any of the IOCCC code I gave it.
Pnut: A C to POSIX shell compiler you can trust
121–124 of 124 posts
Re: Pnut: A C to POSIX shell compiler you can trust
#122If the end goal is portability for C, would Cosmopolitan Libc be a better choice because it supports a lot more features and probably runs faster?
I cant run cosmolibc on Android, for example. Then again this converter is somewhat limited and didn't accept any of the IOCCC code I gave it.
Re: Pnut: A C to POSIX shell compiler you can trust
#123If the end goal is portability for C, would Cosmopolitan Libc be a better choice because it supports a lot more features and probably runs faster?
I cant run cosmolibc on Android, for example. Then again this converter is somewhat limited and didn't accept any of the IOCCC code I gave it.
Re: Pnut: A C to POSIX shell compiler you can trust
#124If the end goal is portability for C, would Cosmopolitan Libc be a better choice because it supports a lot more features and probably runs faster?
I cant run cosmolibc on Android, for example. Then again this converter is somewhat limited and didn't accept any of the IOCCC code I gave it.