Live data from Hacker News

Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

cnn.com

121–130 of 247 posts

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#121
post #65

[flagged]

I mean let’s not pretend this fetish doesn’t already exist and isn’t already actively being catered to in written and visual erotica.

Exactly. Apparently OP didn't know Mew exists and has been fanfictioned in a million different sex acts (fanfucktion?).

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So close!

The greatest thing on this thread is how disappointed we all are for some bizarre reason lol. It would be cool to get them back for better balance.

A prehensile tail would do so much for my cooking skills... the possibilities are infinite.

Wait - I finally found a use case for Neuralink that I can cheer for!

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yet there's plenty of animals that have tails and don't spend time in trees, such as dogs, horses and cows.

The tail seems like vestigial anatomy (originally useful in fish) that has three possible states in mammals: 1. Repurposed for a new function (tree swinging, signals) 2. Not much used but still in the repo (mice) 3. Garbage collected (apes).

Also used to distract and confuse (deer and rabbits)

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#124
Meanwhile, 140k years ago, our 3rd civilization approached our current level of tech. Fashion designers, specifically a group lead by Argot the Great, decided the tail made pants difficult, and broke the lay of suit jackets.

So they hired radicals to genetically engineer a retrovirus, to remove the tail. This worked, but due to unconsidered balance issues, all tail devoid children lost the capability for bipedal balance and therefore walking.

Most of these children, during their formative years spent their time on all fours, and thud their hand dexterity was pitiful, and society crumbled when they came of age.

It was another 46k years before a brain mutation emerged, re-enabling bipedal balance, but by that time all traces of the old civilization was lost, and thus, progress began anew.

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yet there's plenty of animals that have tails and don't spend time in trees, such as dogs, horses and cows.

The tail seems like vestigial anatomy (originally useful in fish) that has three possible states in mammals: 1. Repurposed for a new function (tree swinging, signals) 2. Not much used but still in the repo (mice) 3. Garbage collected (apes).

Kangaroos use their tails as a fifth leg - https://phys.org/news/2014-07-tale-kangaroo-tail.html

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#129

If we're doing germline edits, the obvious thing to fix first is vitamin synthesis. There are a bunch of useful things other living things synthesise from first principles, and we don't so we need to eat something that has already synthesised the thing we wanted, and we can't cook or preserve it in any way that destroys the material we needed or it won't work. That's what scurvy is, a tree or a lizard just makes its…

If we are on this topic then we need to discuss a genetically modified gut microbiota. We do not need to edit genetically ourselves for some pityful vitamins. Microbiota could give us all we want. It could enable us to digest plastic, so we could eat food without removing its packaging. We could reduce severity of our waste problems by digesting plastic into relatively harmless poop.

Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code

#130

If we're doing germline edits, the obvious thing to fix first is vitamin synthesis. There are a bunch of useful things other living things synthesise from first principles, and we don't so we need to eat something that has already synthesised the thing we wanted, and we can't cook or preserve it in any way that destroys the material we needed or it won't work. That's what scurvy is, a tree or a lizard just makes its…

Maybe fix uricase production as well (eliminating gout).
Post reply on HN