[flagged]
I mean let’s not pretend this fetish doesn’t already exist and isn’t already actively being catered to in written and visual erotica.
Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
121–130 of 247 posts
Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
So close!
The greatest thing on this thread is how disappointed we all are for some bizarre reason lol. It would be cool to get them back for better balance.
Wait - I finally found a use case for Neuralink that I can cheer for!
Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yet there's plenty of animals that have tails and don't spend time in trees, such as dogs, horses and cows.
The tail seems like vestigial anatomy (originally useful in fish) that has three possible states in mammals: 1. Repurposed for a new function (tree swinging, signals) 2. Not much used but still in the repo (mice) 3. Garbage collected (apes).
Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#124So they hired radicals to genetically engineer a retrovirus, to remove the tail. This worked, but due to unconsidered balance issues, all tail devoid children lost the capability for bipedal balance and therefore walking.
Most of these children, during their formative years spent their time on all fours, and thud their hand dexterity was pitiful, and society crumbled when they came of age.
It was another 46k years before a brain mutation emerged, re-enabling bipedal balance, but by that time all traces of the old civilization was lost, and thus, progress began anew.
Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#125Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#126Would be cool if we had tails, so I could wag it with my future dog!
Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yet there's plenty of animals that have tails and don't spend time in trees, such as dogs, horses and cows.
The tail seems like vestigial anatomy (originally useful in fish) that has three possible states in mammals: 1. Repurposed for a new function (tree swinging, signals) 2. Not much used but still in the repo (mice) 3. Garbage collected (apes).
Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#128[flagged]
Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#129If we're doing germline edits, the obvious thing to fix first is vitamin synthesis. There are a bunch of useful things other living things synthesise from first principles, and we don't so we need to eat something that has already synthesised the thing we wanted, and we can't cook or preserve it in any way that destroys the material we needed or it won't work. That's what scurvy is, a tree or a lizard just makes its…
Re: Scientists have traced human tail loss to a short sequence of genetic code
#130If we're doing germline edits, the obvious thing to fix first is vitamin synthesis. There are a bunch of useful things other living things synthesise from first principles, and we don't so we need to eat something that has already synthesised the thing we wanted, and we can't cook or preserve it in any way that destroys the material we needed or it won't work. That's what scurvy is, a tree or a lizard just makes its…