Live data from Hacker News

We don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're working on a solution

developer.chrome.com

121–130 of 253 posts

Re: We don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're working on a solution

#121
post #69

The web seems to be becoming paradoxically less and less machine/automation friendly. I recently had to modify 150+ accounts in a Google Workspace. Twenty years ago, I would be doing this in a Unix environment with a very simple shell script. Instead, I had to click-copy-paste-click, 20 times per page, like a monkey. I'm sure there must be some sort of API, but it would have taken 100 times the time it would have tak…

> The web seems to be becoming paradoxically less and less machine/automation friendly

Less distributed/democratized machine/automation friendly... But definitely automation friendly for giant search scrapers, with lots of compute, cash, IP blocks and AI.

I'd like to change that. I originally created BrowserBox^0 as a platform to serve "web scraping authoring tools". These tools are normally served as extensions, or even downloadable electron apps. But what about something easier to distribute, more powerful, more lightweight, and less beholden to walled-garden gatekeeping? BrowserBox changes all that, as it's clientless and runs in a regular web browser even on mobile. Anyone can build a scraping script on top of it, even from your mobile device while riding the bus. That's the vision anyway. But I got side-tracked by how the "embeddable browser" is a useful product in its own right. I still intend to return to fulfilling its original purpose however.

The key is to build a good "extensions-like"-but better-API atop the Chrome DevTools protocol and our BrowserBox functionality. We're open source so come visit if you'd liked to get involved or check it out! :)

0: https://github.com/BrowserBox/BrowserBox

Re: We don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're working on a solution

#122
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Google has an interest in our depending on Google to find stuff, so of course they see RSS as a threat. But they historically had several feed systems [1] [2] which were fully under their control. > Cue some "googler" show up defending this move and how it makes the world better. Of course. 'We have a better system that uses 2FA to securely text you every ten minutes to generate a code that, in combination with a 1…

You forgot Feedburner that Google used to monetized feeds. Almost all bloggers I followed in Google Reader used it to track and monetize. Google had a lot of control over RSS. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FeedBurner

I don't know how it is know but when I was doing a lot of SEO publishing 10 years ago Feedburner was the best kept secret.

People would always be complaining that Google wouldn't index their pages for months but if you: (1) burn an RSS feed, (2) subscribe to the burned feed, and (3) add items to the feed, the items would be indexed almost immediately.

Re: We don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're working on a solution

#124
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm still angry at Google for killing Reader. It was the best way to consume content on the web. I’m happy, it lead to an explosion of available readers, including many self-hosted ones.

Walkers did the same with their crisps ("chips" for left-ponders), made them healthy by reducing the fat content, disgusting, like eating dried leaves. End result: a wealth of new crisp brands and people keen to try them. My favourite, Salty Dog [1], couldn't have happened without Walkers pissing on their own chips ("fries" for left-ponders). [1] https://www.saltydog-grrr.com/category/crisps

Did they get the memo that fat isn't really the enemy? (well, satfat still not ideal, but...)

Re: We don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're working on a solution

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

RSS is still very much around though. Most websites that aren't silos offer them. In fact, big problem is that many websites offer too many RSS feeds, and websites that don't need them offer them; makes algorithmic curation much harder.

More used to offer them than currently do. And the trend has been for sites that have RSS to remove it. So you're correct that RSS has not become extinct due to Google, it has merely contributed to lower adoption. Google reader was the alpha and Omega of RSS feed reading, and it set a standard norm followed by the rest of the internet, and Google's decision to move on from RSS similarly was followed by much of the re…

It's pretty rare to find a news site that doesn't have an RSS feed today. I know because I've been collecting a long list of feeds.

Re: We don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're working on a solution

#126
post #63

I think this thread could good place to share services (self-hosted or paid) that allow to monitor site for changes and make rss/send notification.

I use ChangeDetection,

- https://changedetection.io/#features

- https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io

> Create RSS feeds based on changes in web content

Re: We don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're working on a solution

#127
post #29

> Unfortunately, we don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're actively working on a solution. RSS could be that solution!

> we're actively working on a solution Yeah exactly, what kind of bs is that

"we're actively working on a replacement" doesn't sound as good.

Re: We don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're working on a solution

#129

RSS reader software won't be successful. RSS reader should be built into the browser and every time you open the browser, the RSS feed should be the landing page. Every time you open a new tab, it should show a minimal feed that can be fully expanded.

Firefox used to have this feature, sort of. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/live-bookmarks
Post reply on HN