Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Similarly to how Journalists feel justified in stories that have negative repercussions for some parties being reported upon. One way of assessing these decisions is answering the question "Is more harm done than good by releasing information this to the public?" That method leads to the worst evils in the world. Many have concluded, or used it to justify everything from, 'it's ok to take these poor people's land a…
I cannot follow your thread from a security researcher sharing tools to put pressure on an insecure website, to a megacorporation stealing someone's land.
I'm talking generally about this reasoning, whether used by security researchers or governments condemning land for megacorps (or anyone else):
>>> One way of assessing these decisions is answering the question "Is more harm done than good by releasing information this to the public?"