Live data from Hacker News

Attention didn’t collapse. It was stolen (2022)

theguardian.com

121–122 of 122 posts

Re: Attention didn’t collapse. It was stolen (2022)

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you have a quite limited understanding of the funds and planning that go into crossing the border, and also how effectively people who make that crossing solve other issues in their lives. My brother-in-law's family crossed the border illegally out of dire necessity. However, they still have many others issues (managing money, working for awful bosses, living in crappy housing, family in-fighting, unhappy mar…

> I think you have a quite limited understanding of the funds and planning that go into crossing the border, and also how effectively people who make that crossing solve other issues in their lives. And yet they managed to do it. They could and did move to where there's more opportunity. > but it does not mean they have solved all of their problems Nobody solves all their problems. But they can prioritize, make a pla…

Then let me reiterate my original comment, because I don't understand your argument against it:

>Humans have a limited amount of willpower. The average person can handle addressing a couple of these issues, but some people (especially the poor and the ill) have so many simultaneous issues that their willpower is too divided for them to make meaningful headway.

I also want to mention (again) that immigrating long distances or across closed borders is not free. It's actually very expensive, and often more expensive when done illegally (since those helping you are assuming a personal risk). It is not something that poor people can do. Someone might make themselves poor doing it, but that doesn't mean that they started with nothing.

Re: Attention didn’t collapse. It was stolen (2022)

#122

There seem to be a lot of comments cluck-clucking about personal responsibility, and government intervention is bad, and the way this is written is off-putting, and- And no acknowledgment about how many on here can't really give an unqualified opinion because of where their paychecks originate. I can, though, and here it is: We've done this before, with cigarette companies, treating them with kid gloves and trying to…

Do you want to ban phones in public or do you want to hit the social media companies? Because I would really hate it if I had to not use my phone to take pictures and do direction and listen to podcasts because some people spend too much time on Facebook.

The second seems more cogent.
Post reply on HN