Live data from Hacker News

YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

torrentfreak.com

121–130 of 256 posts

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can listen to music on the radio, but it's a whole different issue when I pick specific songs to pirate for my own personal listening :p But that's not where the caring comes in; it's the tools I can use to pirate songs; hence youtube-dl going down and not the users who used it. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a TOS clause about videos on YT not being your property and that you can't export them off the platform…

>I can listen to music on the radio, but it's a whole different issue when I pick specific songs to pirate for my own personal listening :p But that's not where the caring comes in; it's the tools I can use to pirate songs; hence youtube-dl going down and not the users who used it. So basically you are not allowed to listen to what your mood wants but rather what their sponsors want, that or pay us! Yeah no thanks. B…

I can pick specific songs and even download them for offline playback with Spotify. A problem in that case would come if I try to bypass Spotify's copy protection and play the offline songs in a different player.

youtube-dl was bypassing geo-blocks.

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#122
What I don't understand is why aren't these companies suing YouTube/Alphabet?

They're the one's enabling the purported copyright violations. They're the ones profiting. They're the ones with the mountain of money attorneys are generally employed to take from.

If anything these attorneys should be supporting youtube-dl/yt-dlp maintenance and using it in support of their claims. What could be more damming of YouTube's negligence than showing the court a silly headless web browser written in python optimized for video sites can leech copyrighted materials from youtube.com?

YouTube/Alphabet will only get off their asses and _really_ prevent this activity the moment it costs more than the neglect generates in revenue.

Maybe this is some 4D chess, but from where I'm sitting these attorneys look like clowns.

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

It’s too late, I have both a python interpreter and a 3D printer Become ungovernable

I have a bootloader, an internet connection and the C manual! I shall conquer the world!

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#125
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's funny how a trillion-dollar company is playing cat-and-mouse with a few free software projects, and losing most of the time.

I have a feeling Google/Alphabet/YouTube aren't investing a lot of money into this, because they know their opponents have almost infinite resource, of free time and dedication. Besides how would you like to work in the YouTube "DRM" team, where every few weeks you'd show up to work and the news is "well, they cracked it again, your last few months' of work is useless.".

Honestly, that does sound kind of fun. Requires more creativity than building CRUD app after CRUD app

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#126
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn’t matter, saying you can’t download this publicly available video is like saying you can’t copy the text of this article, both are inane to think of.

I get the point but I've seen some sites even block copy/paste :p

Just disable js, works every time :)

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#127

So you can only legally watch Youtube videos when and where you have a fast and unlimited internet connection? That sucks... Let's say you only have a cellular data plan, but it has a data cap, or your cell coverage is slow. So when a friend sends you a link to a video, you go to a library or coffee shop to download it to watch later. Is that "acting in bad faith?" I guess it gets in the way of Youtube's "right" to s…

The YouTube app lets you download videos and watch them online, but only with YouTube Premium.

Similarly, Google removed any unofficial YouTube apps from the Play Store that supported playing with the screen off, because they want you to pay for it.

Tangential (but infuriating): there was a several year gap between them banning apps with background playback, and actually launching that feature (via Premium) in my country...

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#128

What I don't understand is why aren't these companies suing YouTube/Alphabet? They're the one's enabling the purported copyright violations. They're the ones profiting. They're the ones with the mountain of money attorneys are generally employed to take from. If anything these attorneys should be supporting youtube-dl/yt-dlp maintenance and using it in support of their claims. What could be more damming of YouTube's…

Alphabet has a larger legal budget, which makes them unattractive targets for baseless lawsuits.
Post reply on HN