Live data from Hacker News

Exway doesn't care about USB-C conformity

ericswpark.com

121–122 of 122 posts

Re: Exway doesn't care about USB-C conformity

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The chip is very expensive, sadly. If it were just a matter of the cartel, that would be one thing (and would have Shenzhen-made workarounds). No, the USB lunatics made USB-PD one of the most insane specifications you'll ever find, so that no one can implement it correctly period. (Seriously, it's actually the description of the actual behavior of an old TI part, bugs and all, turned into a spec. It's horrid . It's t…

As someone who has read the PD spec and agrees with your assessment- I’m curious what that chip is?

I don't, I'm sorry. I also don't think I ever tracked down that part myself (but who knows, it's been years), so it may not actually be true. But it's sure plausible!

Re: Exway doesn't care about USB-C conformity

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yah, there are lots of good reasons to be grateful for USB (especially before the fiasco that is type C). I'm just bitter and resentful about being forced to pay thousands of dollars for an artificially scarce number.

do you really need to get a vendor number? I've assumed there's an unregulated section somewhere. I think most cheap devices I've tangled with use the vendor number of whoever made the chipset. (or a random one, because chineseium)

Yes, you do.

You can beg for one from a chip vendor, but they aren't really permitted to dole them out, and they will help once, but not for production distributions.

You can ignore it, make one up, or just try to take someone else's, but there be dragons that way too.

If you plan to distribute an actual electronic product under a real business name, you must first pay these trolls thousands of dollars.

It's probably a rounding error for companies who make billions of things, but for small market goods?

USB-IF says, "Get rekt nerd! Gimme yer lunch money!

Post reply on HN