Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've always had this background thought that it would be a fun job to do "due diligence" on behalf of VCs. I remember being on the receiving end of some of that work, and I wasn't all that impressed. Do today's VCs take technical due diligence seriously? If not, why not?
Technical due dilligence isnt that important. The first thing is that the product has to scale, be popular, then maybe make money. You can always hire people who will rewrite. The opposite doesnt work. Technically brilliant product might be unpopular or unknown. Please note: I dont say that things should be built poorly.
Case in point is the JPMC acquisition of Frank and Frank's CEO Charlie Javice.
Turns out all of the user numbers were made up. A technical DD would have easily surfaced this even though the user numbers and volume is business related.