Earlier quoted context omitted.
Companies like tailwind Engineers learn to work with it due to that simple fact. It's OK tbh, and it's easily interoperable between stacks so not really hard to pick up and useful if your project already uses it. I tried to fight it at first, but I've only seen it being used more and more. Why fight the stream if there's no good reason for it?
> Why fight the stream if there's no good reason for it? Why jump tool chains when you already have more than enough on your plate to keep up with? I watched a conference presentation last week from a front-end person who talked about FE design. He pulled up a slide on bootstrap and said "if you use bootstrap, everything will end up looking like twitter. your login page won't be able to be creative, you'll just look…
Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
121–130 of 148 posts
Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you end up using tailwind with jump start rails? Any way around it? I like the idea of jump start rails but would like to stay away from tailwindcss.
Have you tried it on a real project? Tailwind is a huge time saver when compared to traditional CSS or SASS.
Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#123Anyone know of anything like this but for javascript frameworks?
Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#124Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess what your parent poster is saying is that: without types, all you have is the variable name to guess what it does. IDEs help but there's only so much they can do.
Yes that's what I meant. All you have is a variable and IDEs can't figure it all if there's no type on it. Not just that, let's say even if type is known but some of the methods are generated on runtime than IDE has no idea about it.
Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#126Is this using Hotwire?
They seem to have their own 'reactive' way of doing it called Sprinkles but I don't think they've open sourced it yet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NqjpInVIjc&t=181s
Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#127Wow, hi everyone! Was just about to walk over for the first day of RailsConf when a friend let me know we were #1 here! Honored! I'm the original creator of Bullet Train, although a number of people now work on it. It's been a fun journey to this point! When I first started building Bullet Train, it was a relatively unique offering. There weren't that many full-featured "SaaS starter kits" out there, although there w…
The "Join the Mailing List" link on the home page is dead now btw.
Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#128I haven't used Bullet Train, but I've found their "Teams should be an MVP feature" blog post [1] a really great overview of how to model team structures in relational databases before. Worth a read! [1]: https://blog.bullettrain.co/teams-should-be-an-mvp-feature/
I've had a hard time searching for patterns and tips for modeling common data/features for web applications.
Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recall when I started even with Rails pre Rails 2.0, the Spring framework was a horror show. Good luck with XML plumbing and then annotations wiring and then dependency injection container and AbstractBusinessProxyFascadSingletonFactory whereas in contrast, Rails seems light years ahead from controllers to templating to ORM.
Why the downvotes?
Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework
#130Wow, hi everyone! Was just about to walk over for the first day of RailsConf when a friend let me know we were #1 here! Honored! I'm the original creator of Bullet Train, although a number of people now work on it. It's been a fun journey to this point! When I first started building Bullet Train, it was a relatively unique offering. There weren't that many full-featured "SaaS starter kits" out there, although there w…