121–130 of 244 posts
For whatever reason we seem to have set a very high expectation from AI as compared to NI (Natural Intelligence). I remember reading "There is a considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists."
I'm increasingly convinced you can build an agi system with gpt4. People are trying to get it to solve everything up front but I've had GPT3 do much better by taking it through a problem asking it questions. Then I realised it was good at asking those questions too so just hooked it up to talk to itself with different roles. Gpt4 seems much better overall and is very good at using tools if you just tell it how and wh…
What, then, is the human brain if not a trained statistical model? Granted it is considerably more sophisticated in some ways, but in many other ways it is less sophisticated and less capable.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
With enough patience, yes. For example: You have a goat, a wolf, a cabbage and you want to cross a river...
That Goat wolf cabbage problem gpt-4 can solve already
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you predict the top comments For a claim would be: 1. Dismisal 2. Trivialism 3. Non Well Formed Claim 4. I accept the claim 5. Disprove by counter example Are you sure you have not forgotten any tactic of debate to include in you prediction? I predict that you Prediction will result probably in these actions: 1. upvoted 2. downvoted
6. Meta comment for karma whoring 7. Like 6, but funnier A. Joke thread pile on B. Reprimands from humorless C. Dejected mods having to clean it all up
I'm imagining humans being told "you complete thought sentences"
From the intro: "we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system." What does that mean? If we take it as fact, so if it is an early version of AGI, Microsoft is using this thing to push subscriptions to all their services? This thing that is potentially the greatest thing humanity has made, an artificial living thing, and it's…
From the intro: "we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system." What does that mean? If we take it as fact, so if it is an early version of AGI, Microsoft is using this thing to push subscriptions to all their services? This thing that is potentially the greatest thing humanity has made, an artificial living thing, and it's…
It's a product, and it's not that far away from that of their competitors. And there are a lot. Just a few weeks ago, Yann LeCun said that llms are not particularly interesting or innovative from the research point of view.
For whatever reason we seem to have set a very high expectation from AI as compared to NI (Natural Intelligence). I remember reading "There is a considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists."
But where are my damn robots that I can assign task and do them reliably ( clean the garden, go get this list of groceries - or , just look in the damn fridge and go buy what is missing , and so on )?
Then AI is useful.
My prediction for the top comments of this thread (paraphrased) 1. It's just Microsoft's advertisement 2. No it's just a very effective pattern matching algorithm 3. Please define intelligence first otherwise it's nonsense 4. I welcome our machine overlord 5. Lmao I asked it to do $thing and it failed I'd like to know if GPT-4 can predict the top comments of this thread?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
With enough patience, yes. For example: You have a goat, a wolf, a cabbage and you want to cross a river...
How would you do it, tree search? If yes, I tend to agree with your initial statement that one should be able to teach LLMs to apply simple heuristics before considering it AGI.
So the supervisor algorithm will do the tree search if needed.