Live data from Hacker News

Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

assets.rivian.com

121–130 of 173 posts

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#121
post #73
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought that until Tesla wrecked everyone.

Wrecked them how? It’s 22Q4 sales numbers are a quarter of GM. They currently rank in 9th place in production. It’s taken them a decade to get a dealer network built. Their repairs timeline sound just as horrifying as their competitors. https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/2023-us-auto-sales-figures-by-...

You should maybe look a little bit deeper. Tesla already makes more money then Ford and GM combined, and that is simple profit. Beyond that Tesla has basically no debt and a great cash position, while the others have huge amounts of debt.

Tesla is still growing fast, has extensive self owned infrastructure in charging and service that will be very profitable and is a huge, huge asset. Tesla is competitive with European car makers in Europe, a market GM has dropped, and Ford mostly so relaying on VW MEB to stay in it at all. Tesla is competitive with car makers in China as well. GM and Ford have very little chance of even establishing their EVs seriously there. In fact the opposite, cars from China will compete with them in the US.

In the meantime the car industry has historically high level of access production capacity. Lots of old ICE and engine plants running below capacity, closing them is hard and costly. At the same time they have to do 10s of billions of new investments in new facilities.

At the same time the ICE sales are going down, lower economics of scale, access manufacturing means seriously negative margin. And that right around the time when anybody with half a brain will realize that buying and ICE car will be a bad investment and resell value will be low. This will collapse resale value of ICE cars and that impacts their financials.

Battery materials are a limiting factor already, and there is no physical way all the announced car makers plans can actually happen. Yes, mining is expanding, but not as fast as battery manufacturing and EV demand. Those companies that did not planned for this for the last 5 years will run into massive issues.

> It’s taken them a decade to get a dealer network built.

Meanwhile Ford and GM and co are literally in a war with dealerships over service. VW is literally suing its dealers and the auto lobby are launching a large scale lobbying effort to prevent the dealers lobbying effort. This could potentially cut 100s of millions away from the already thin profits of the car makers.

Literally every other car maker would kill to be in Tesla position.

> Their repairs timeline sound just as horrifying as their competitors.

Maybe be true or not, but on service, current car makers only maybe 20% of the money, the rest goes to dealers. Tesla will earn 100% of the money.

Its not well understood, but parts are a huge reason why traditional OEMs are profitable at all. Tesla meanwhile has very few old cars on the road, and many new cars under warranty. Despite that, Tesla service business is already profitable, and that is before millions of cars will go off warranty in a few years.

Again, literally every single car maker would love to be in Teslas situation.

One last point, if you insist on comparing how many cars they make. Look at the trendlines, not just a single year.

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#122
post #61
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought that until Tesla wrecked everyone.

"wrecked"... Tesla didn't even come close to wrecking anybody. They came in as a new competitor, and are still massively overvalued because of investor delusion.

Claiming everybody else is delusional when you are probably no rich from speculating is always a fun claim.

The car industry is consolidating. Chrysler is one example, they simply had no chance in hell to have any EV strategy. Now they have at least something thanks to their merger resulting in PSA. More such things will happen in the next 5 years.

Go look at how many cars companies like GM used to sell, and how many they are selling now.

Tesla is more profitable then GM and Ford combined, something that people would have not believed just a few years ago (not even mention debt, growth and other things).

They are not "wrecked" but everybody in the car industry knows that Tesla together with the rise of China auto is gone be a huge hammer to the rest of the industry. But with business like this, it takes years for these things to unfold.

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> they’re not practical replacements for a full size pickup truck (as the F-150 Lightning is). Why not? I’ve done “truck stuff” in a Rivian, like towing a 5 ton car trailer over the Sierra Nevadas. They have the same towing capacity and the Rivian has better battery range. They also cost the same similarly equipped. What’s the issue?

Probably bed size.

Bed size on contemporary F150s is also a joke. They're mostly just suburban mini-vans for the macho set.

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#124
post #112

The financials may not look good right now, but the vehicles are extremely good. They’re already way out in front of the EV truck segment, and the big automakers have a huge gap to make up to reach the same level of quality. I wouldn’t be surprised if they manage to turn this around and become profitable.

If you want a truck for looks, EV is nice enough. If you want a truck to haul stuff, EV is terrible . Put a trailer on your EV and they have basically no range at all. If you need a truck to haul stuff reasonable distances, EV isn't for you (at least not right now). If you want to save the world, then an electric car gets much better ranges with much smaller batteries and a fraction of the power usage. This leaves EV…

Most hauling around is local, within a city or region. EV range is reasonable and actually has many advantages over ICE cars. Operating cost being a huge one. Torque being the other.

And the reality is the waste majority of people simple don't drive long distances with trailers. Study after study shows how that simply not why most people buy trucks.

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Rivian is a full-size truck and performs as good or better than the Lightning for similar tasks.

That bed length disadvantage is pretty significant if you're coming to it from the "truck user" market vs the "weekend camper" or "soccer mom" market. I was interested in a Rivian until I saw one in person and saw how short that bed was. It wasn't the first spec I'd looked at on paper, but jumped out in-person. In that size I'd probably go cheap with a Maverick hybrid for now until there are more full-EV competitors.

The Rivian's marketed towards the "adventure" segment. It's definitely not intended as a work truck.

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#126
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The ratios are different, but Uber lost over $2B last year, and overall, has lost $9B. Tesla didn't turn a profit for 8 years, until 2020, and from 2016-2018, regularly had 12 trailing months of $1B losses or more.

Worth mentioning the thing that likely motivated TSLA to be profitable is that it’s a requirement to be considered for inclusion in the S&P 500 index.

I don't really think that is worth mentioning. Tesla always wanted to be profitable, to get their they need a high margin mass production vehicle. Since they had that, the Model 3, they have been profitable. The Model 3 was always the plan.

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#127

How does this company — or any company, for that matter — continue operating in the long term with that much significant (i.e. 1B) gross loss?

They can't, they need to turn it around eventually.

But they have the advantage that the IPO at the exact right moment and have absurd amounts of cash to burn.

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#128
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You hear this all the time. There is no such thing as a huge lead in automaking. It’s an incredibly clonable product, and each company has huge teams taking apart each others products. It’s also not really the product that matters. It’s service centers, parts, repairs, manufacturing capacity. The traditional companies have entrenched supply chains to get parts, and cars, across the country and into hands. All the new…

Think of it from the perspective of disruption. Large, incumbent businesses get disrupted all the time. A major indicator of a David beating a Goliath is when the rules of the business change. And, with EVs, the rules of the business have changed, pretty much overnight. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Innovator%27s_Dilemma IMO: Rivian is ripe for a major investment from an outsider with a lot of cash, (like Amazon,…

Did Slack beat Teams? Xerox or Apple?

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#129

I think these look great, but I can't see them replacing combustion engines for all the things people who drive trucks in the country need. Like... I'm not going to load this up with fence posts and go out for a 12 hour day... plugging in the fence post digger to the battery... I'd be afraid that since I can't just toss in an extra gas tank that I'd be walking home. And I can't see this pulling a horse trailer across…

People still livin in a fantasy world where most trucks are used by farmers to put up fence posts. Its hilarious.

Every single stastic and analysis shows that the waste majority of truck drivers barley ever use trailer and haul stuff in the extreme minority of case. And even then they mostly haul locally.

> But EVs are still "toys" in my mind.

By that definition, most F-150 are toys.

The reality is there is a 2 million a year truck market and EV trucks are totally reasonably for 70% of that market and that is growing fast.

Re: Rivian announces 1B gross loss and 600M revenue [pdf]

#130
post #6

[flagged]

Public transportation is a luxury. It assumes that you can live in a dense area and that your travel needs coincide with bus/train routes. It's very practical for many, and very impractical for many too.

You must be American.

In fact, insane car and highway infrastructure is actually a luxury. Funny how roads just magically spring up everywhere and they are 'required to live' but god forbid a bus that uses that road, that is luxury. Public subsidy of car infrastructure is far higher then for public transport.

> coincide with bus/train routes

There is this thing called planning. They put public transport where it is actually needed. Its not like 'ohh luck, they just so happened to build a train here'.

If your country has a serious imperative of doing public infrastructure correctly, then the amount of people who can reasonably be reached is very, very high.

And good urbanism isn't just density. Look at some railroad towns in the East, they have walkable rural urbanism. You don't need a car to live in such places. Or maybe one car for a whole large family.

Sure yes, there is some people who that doesn't include. But lets be fucking real, most people live in cities or in suburban areas. Or in sprawl town loosely attached to some larger metro area.

Post reply on HN