Live data from Hacker News

Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

techcrunch.com

121–130 of 208 posts

Re: Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

#121
post #16

Somewhat related: I've long wondered why ATM cards don't have something similar. 1234 is my regular PIN. 1235 is my help I'm being robbed PIN -- it dispenses the cash, calls the cops, and tags the video.

Several of the PIN-activated access control systems I've used have a similar concept, usually called a duress code or such. Your normal PIN would be 1234 but if you are being forced to enter under duress you put in 1235, and a silent alarm is set off.

Re: Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That isn't true for Linux and Windows. X (the service commonly providing the *nix GUI) was pretty much built with this in mind; Linux has had an implementation of X that has provided this since at least the mid-90s. Windows has had this on the server since at least Windows Server 2003, and has also introduced it to the "consumer" market in Windows 7. (I'd be happy to find out whether OS X supports this or not.)

I tried to do this couple years ago for Linux, asked around, and was told this was not possible for Linux. Apparently I was misinformed. I'm happy to be wrong about it. Can you point me to instructions for doing it for Ubuntu? I have Windows XP, and have had 2000, NT, 98, 95, etc., and none of them could do it. I'm glad to see that finally this "40 year old technology" is getting onto desktops in the last year or so.

http://www.craigryder.com/linux-ubuntudebetc/x11-forwarding-...

Re: Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

#123
post #94
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought that iOS and/or Android gave each App its own user account in order to sandbox permissions between apps, so that they can't overwrite each other's files. If all of the user data for an app is owned by that app's uid, then wouldn't this allow someone else running that app to somehow gain access to user data from another 'actual' user? E.g. App1 has uid 100 User1 has uid 101 User2 has uid 102 If all userdata…

This is a good example of how HN has gone down the tubes. I've been downvoted to -1 based solely on a post where I raised a possible security concern. I admitted that I wasn't fully versed, but I expected someone to correct my if I was wrong. Instead, I'm downvoted, but no one has bothered to actually post useful information. Am I wrong? Did someone just 'not like the tone' of my post for some strange reason? Who kno…

Ephemeral voting noise is not going down the tubes.

Re: Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

#124
post #56
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean Fast user switching? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_user_switching

I mean fast user switching on a resource-constrained portable device. There's a bit of a difference in terms of how to do it. (See also my above post listing some of the issues)

Current gen mobile phones are already more powerful than my first Windows XP desktop. I don't think computing resources are a limiting factor here.

Re: Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

#125
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, they restricted the selection. They also encouraged each number to be unique.

That's a funny requirement. Requiring uniques reduces password strength.

Bank PINs aren't really about password strength though. To prevent brute force, they simply block access after n tries (usually n = 3). They are just a way of preventing access to the card in case of loss or theft. So as long as there are enough combinations to make the chance of a successful brute force after three tries small enough, it doesn't really matter how strong the password is.

For online banking, there are usually added security schemes and the PIN isn't used at all.

Re: Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

#126
On Android there is an app called "Hide it Pro" [1] (aka Audio Manager) that allows you to hide pictures and videos. The app disguises itself as an audio manager in the app drawer. To access the hidden files you have to type a PIN code. There is also an escape PIN if you get caught hiding files. Clever idea.

[1] https://market.android.com/details?id=com.smartanuj.hideitpr...

Re: Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

#127
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With that, you've just admitted that you're aware of the possibility of setting up multiple profiles with different unlock codes. Be careful what information you leak when you're trying to look innocent!

How so? The officer was the one that suggested the possibility in this scenario.

Yes, but the answer shows that you were aware of it before, which means you have already come in contact with the concept, leading to a higher probability for you to actually use it.

Re: Why Don’t Smartphones Have A “Guest Mode”?

#128
post #122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried to do this couple years ago for Linux, asked around, and was told this was not possible for Linux. Apparently I was misinformed. I'm happy to be wrong about it. Can you point me to instructions for doing it for Ubuntu? I have Windows XP, and have had 2000, NT, 98, 95, etc., and none of them could do it. I'm glad to see that finally this "40 year old technology" is getting onto desktops in the last year or so.

http://www.craigryder.com/linux-ubuntudebetc/x11-forwarding-...

Thank you. I will give it a try.
Post reply on HN