Guess what component a simulator named diode that doesn't have...
A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
121–130 of 270 posts
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#122Guess what component a simulator named diode doesn't have...
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#123This does nothing but spike my CPU. :(
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#124Schematics are for understanding what a circuit does. Breadboards are for prototyping small low-speed circuits. Veroboard is for prototyping larger medium-speed circuits. Gerbers & a PCB are for production and for prototyping large or high-speed circuits. If the tool could automatically make a 3D breadboard view from a schematic, it'd be pretty neat for beginners. If the tool warned you when the normal parasitic capa…
This is a tangent, but having worked with digital circuits for 40 years, the improvements in chips have made circuit construction -- even breadboarding -- vastly more forgiving than ever before. I've run 10 MHz clocks on breadboards and 100 MHz SPI bus on 2 layer boards that were not designed with extreme care. And, it's a fast precision ADC that's meeting its datasheet specs on that board. No doubt the parasitics an…
That's been a funny thing for me. I'm not an electrical engineer, at all. My electrical knowledge is an introductory electromagnetics course I had to take in college that I've mostly forgotten, reading/watching EEVblog, other internet sources, playing around with cheap and/or old parts, reading whatever I can find, etc.
I've made some retrocomputing boards ( 4 layer boards can be had for very cheap these days (JLCPCB does 10 for $30 w/ ENIG boards up to 10cm x 10cm), so I followed the "just do yourself a favor and get the 4 layers boards so you can make ground and power planes" advice. Used a tool to compute minimum trace spacing to stay under a certain capacitance for a specific copper weight, board thickness, dielectric type, etc.
Probably my crowning achievement at this point is making an 1.8V LVDS to TMDS level shifter board so I can get HDMI 1.2a (4x 1.65 Gbps lanes + sidebands) out of an FPGA board I repurposed from some cryptomining hardware I bought on eBay. Had to learn how to do soldering using a stencil, paste, hot air station, and a hotplate because no one is hand soldering 0.4mm QFN packages. 0402 are the smallest thing I can do by hand.
Next thing I want to try is breaking out a small BGA. Managed to get a few Lattice iCE40HX8K's in the CT256 package (256 balls @ 0.8mm pitch BGA).
What hurts is how patent/royalty/industry interest group encumbered that nearly everything modern is. Want to do PCIe? Join PCIe SIG. Want to do USB? Join USB-IF. Want to support SD cards? Pay a bunch to SDA. Actually their patents expired so maybe you can do native SD mode now without much fear. HDMI is awful, DisplayPort requires you to join VESA, MIPI for CSI and DSI devices, etc.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#125No post body was provided.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a tangent, but having worked with digital circuits for 40 years, the improvements in chips have made circuit construction -- even breadboarding -- vastly more forgiving than ever before. I've run 10 MHz clocks on breadboards and 100 MHz SPI bus on 2 layer boards that were not designed with extreme care. And, it's a fast precision ADC that's meeting its datasheet specs on that board. No doubt the parasitics an…
It also helps a lot when you get a well made breadboard from BusBoard [1] instead of the Aliexpress special. [1] https://www.busboard.com/
I just get the ones that the EEs throw away when someone retires. ;-)
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a tangent, but having worked with digital circuits for 40 years, the improvements in chips have made circuit construction -- even breadboarding -- vastly more forgiving than ever before. I've run 10 MHz clocks on breadboards and 100 MHz SPI bus on 2 layer boards that were not designed with extreme care. And, it's a fast precision ADC that's meeting its datasheet specs on that board. No doubt the parasitics an…
That's been a funny thing for me. I'm not an electrical engineer, at all. My electrical knowledge is an introductory electromagnetics course I had to take in college that I've mostly forgotten, reading/watching EEVblog, other internet sources, playing around with cheap and/or old parts, reading whatever I can find, etc. I've made some retrocomputing boards ( 4 layer boards can be had for very cheap these days (JLCPCB…
Yeah, joining the clubs is burdensome. I'm lucky to be in an industry where there's enough value-add, that we just pay the piper and move on. Myself, I buy that kind of stuff pre-integrated.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#128The competition might look ancient, but IMO, a 2D interface would be much more productive and easier to work with. This site is completely unusable for me in Firefox (it does work in Edge though).
If you have ever used LTSpice you'd know, the "old" looking layout is not really a problem but the arcane way anything is done, different from every app I ever used.
I jump from altium to kicad to solidworks multiple times a day but the most annoying jump is when I go to ltspice and go, why is move bound to F7. I stopped even bothering to try to use hotkeys on LTspice.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#129Pretty awesome, thanks for building this.
Re: A circuit simulator that doesn't look like it was made in 2003
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a tangent, but having worked with digital circuits for 40 years, the improvements in chips have made circuit construction -- even breadboarding -- vastly more forgiving than ever before. I've run 10 MHz clocks on breadboards and 100 MHz SPI bus on 2 layer boards that were not designed with extreme care. And, it's a fast precision ADC that's meeting its datasheet specs on that board. No doubt the parasitics an…
That's been a funny thing for me. I'm not an electrical engineer, at all. My electrical knowledge is an introductory electromagnetics course I had to take in college that I've mostly forgotten, reading/watching EEVblog, other internet sources, playing around with cheap and/or old parts, reading whatever I can find, etc. I've made some retrocomputing boards ( 4 layer boards can be had for very cheap these days (JLCPCB…
"Want to do PCIe? Join PCIe SIG. Want to do USB? Join USB-IF..."
As someone who works for a large silicon vendor I can tell you that even with access to those industry groups the documentation still sucks!!!! I look at the amazing documentation available surrounding various software initiatives (OpenCV, machine learning, linux drivers, programming languages, etc...) with envy. It's all right there and out in the open with multiple blogs and forums and pages explaining shit. And actually I did try to learn PCIe. I gave up. 1000+ reference specs, about 3 random web pages and a half dozen marketing youtube video's. There's a reason why some guys manage to build niche careers around these HW topics!