Live data from Hacker News

VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

virtualbox.org

121–130 of 176 posts

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if they find out you've been using it commercially (even just your home machine you have a non-running copy on connecting to your company's VPN network) without an existing licence, they're squeezing your balls in open court.

I looked it up, $50 per licence with a 100 licence minimum. Shame, Id pay per licence if I could, but instead I’ll probably just block their traffic and breach their licence. I doubt they can legally enforce those terms in Australia.

Why? Alternatives exists.

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#122
post #13

Is there a way to stop vbox from phoning home to Oracle?

i use pihole rules :/

Presumably Oracle owns enough IP addresses to not rely on DNS. Or even to catch those why try to block DNS from resolving for their IP addresses.

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#123

Has anyone had luck getting decent GUI performance (macOS host, Linux guest)? I don't need 3D, just sane 2D performance. The last time I tried this, it was so bad that I had to drastically decrease the window size to get reasonable performance. As in, it would basically lock up above a certain window size, and no reasonable amount of waiting would get it to respond. (And yes, I fiddled with all of the obvious knobs f…

GPU passthrough or weep. This is why VMs are so rare on consumer devices.

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#124
Does it support WSL2 inside VM? If you want to use it with USB 2.0 commercially: can you buy a single commercial license or do you still need to buy with "minimum order quantity: 100" for US$50.00 each[1]?

[1] https://shop.oracle.com/apex/f?p=dstore:product:265957255943...

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For a Linux guest, I just forward the host's pulseaudio socket over ssh. ssh -R /run/user/1000/pulse/native:/run/user/1000/pulse/native -X the-vm the-audio-using-command I use this VM for occasional video watching and for video conferencing and haven't had any audio problems.

This is a good hack, and it works better than a lot of alternatives, albeit Linux-on-Linux VMs have arguably few uses since systemd-nspawn exists (so you can just --bind the Pipewire socket in the VM)

I'd say that Docker has replaced more Linux-on-Linux VMs than has systemd-nspawn. That said, I'm seriously interested in what GP is doing that he's forwarding audio. Maybe testing desktop distros? Circumventing DRM? Multiseating an office with thinclients?

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#126
post #111
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ironically they were contributors to their own downfall.

That was a last-gasp attempt to regain relevancy. It really looked desperate, there was no real business plan behind it and the market could tell.

Your're missing their contributions to run Linux on their hardware, back when it wasn't seen as a danger to their bottom line.

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#127

Has anyone had luck getting decent GUI performance (macOS host, Linux guest)? I don't need 3D, just sane 2D performance. The last time I tried this, it was so bad that I had to drastically decrease the window size to get reasonable performance. As in, it would basically lock up above a certain window size, and no reasonable amount of waiting would get it to respond. (And yes, I fiddled with all of the obvious knobs f…

I discovered a few days ago that VMware now offer a 'Fusion 12 Player', which is free (as in beer) albeit you have to register to get the download + key. Might be worth looking into that?

Hi Stu :)

The link for that is here [0].

The only thing I would add to that is to use a private browser session.

Also as a tip fill in "None" for business name, if you are using it privately - as it is a required field for some ffing reason.

But yes, the free VMware Fusion Player works fine.

[0] https://vmware.com/go/get-fusionplayer-key

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#128

Oooh! Will 2022 be the year when a virtualization platform can finally run The Sims 2? ;)

I was a big user of dual boot and VFIO, but thanks to the advent of Proton and the recent Wine improvements (DXVK, ...) I've found myself rebooting into Windows for gaming less and less over the course of the last few years. Sure, not everything works, but basically everything single player does with just a few hiccups.

Have you considered just not playing the games that require Windows? There are _plenty_ of really great Linux games. If not, I'd love to know why. I'm not being polemic, I'm not a gamer, but simply avoiding games that don't run on Linux seems rather easy today.

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#129
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And who would take their place moving Java forward? Since Sun went down, it hardly goes over 10% of external contributions, and no one else cared about getting hold of Java 6.

> And who would take their place moving Java forward? Dotnet - it's already ahead, and the existing software can stay in the current Java version. (I'm joking (but not really))

I do .NET and Java for 20 years now, there are so many workloads where .NET still doesn't matter at all.

Why do you think Microsoft is now back in Java land with their own distribution, after everything that happened with Sun's lawsuit?

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#130
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And who would take their place moving Java forward? Since Sun went down, it hardly goes over 10% of external contributions, and no one else cared about getting hold of Java 6.

I'd wager external contributions are reflecting people's opinion of Oracle. I'd never contribute to something they own.

Yet they gladly profit from it.

It is like all Sun freeloaders complaining about Oracle buying the company, while no one else bothered to get them out of trouble.

Post reply on HN