Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

http://(Type any keyword here).jpg.to

jpg.to

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

121–129 of 129 posts

Re: http://(Type any keyword here).jpg.to

#121

Post by digitalboss »

korussian wrote: post #46

I teach EFL, and this would be fantastically useful in class for matching up vocab with pictures on the fly. The only issue is: I need a much larger rez image to put up on the big projector. Since this is doing Google Image Search... any chance for a: http://keyword.jpg.to/large http://keyword.jpg.to/medium [plus] http://keyword.jpg.to/photo http://keyword.jpg.to/clipart [plus] http://keyword.jpg.to/red http://keywor…

Good ideas.

Works like expected: http://fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu.jpg.to

Reddit will have a field day with this.

Re: http://(Type any keyword here).jpg.to

#122

Post by rrrhys »

newman314 wrote: post #109
folkster wrote: post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Very true. I planned to introduce a page for every image to attribute the source in the near future. And I would delete them upon the owner's request. (just like youtube video)

I'm sorry but this is not good enough. You should try to do better than "what Youtube does". Delete upon owner request (a la DMCA) is a legal maneuver. You should be able to parse out if an image is licensed as Creative Commons or public domain and show only those pictures. Else assume all rights reserved. Not to pick on your project but it's time that people try to do better than take the easiest path of show all im…

Do you have a realistic way to go about this? Especially in what is more than likely a 50 line project.

I really disagree with the approach of blowing apart a fun project and insisting bloat like a text parsing engine be added to make you happy.

http://keyword.jpg.to/source or http://keyword.jpg.to/s would do just fine IMO.

Re: http://(Type any keyword here).jpg.to

#123

Post by naner »

korussian wrote: post #46

I teach EFL, and this would be fantastically useful in class for matching up vocab with pictures on the fly. The only issue is: I need a much larger rez image to put up on the big projector. Since this is doing Google Image Search... any chance for a: http://keyword.jpg.to/large http://keyword.jpg.to/medium [plus] http://keyword.jpg.to/photo http://keyword.jpg.to/clipart [plus] http://keyword.jpg.to/red http://keywor…

The only issue is: I need a much larger rez image to put up on the big projector.

There doesn't appear to be any size checking at all. I got a doozy:

http://senator.jpg.to/

Re: http://(Type any keyword here).jpg.to

#126

Post by _gd3l »

folkster wrote: post #38
_gd3l wrote: post #32

I like this a lot. Placehold.it features would be nice, too. so like, if I wanted just a picture of Bruce Willis: http://bruce_wilis.jpg.to/ But then if I needed a 500x500 picture of Bruce Willis, because who doesn't, I could go to http://bruce_wilis.jpg.to/500x500 Fun little app. Nice work.

Nice suggestion! Seems like many people would like modifiers behind the url. That's what I want to implement soon.

Cool. It'd definitely spice up placeholder images when designing a website...

Re: http://(Type any keyword here).jpg.to

#127

Post by newman314 »

rrrhys wrote: post #122
newman314 wrote: post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sorry but this is not good enough. You should try to do better than "what Youtube does". Delete upon owner request (a la DMCA) is a legal maneuver. You should be able to parse out if an image is licensed as Creative Commons or public domain and show only those pictures. Else assume all rights reserved. Not to pick on your project but it's time that people try to do better than take the easiest path of show all im…

Do you have a realistic way to go about this? Especially in what is more than likely a 50 line project. I really disagree with the approach of blowing apart a fun project and insisting bloat like a text parsing engine be added to make you happy. http://keyword.jpg.to/source or http://keyword.jpg.to/s would do just fine IMO.

Fun does not mean you should ignore copyright.

Copyright info is readily available in EXIF or other metadata.

It's also trivial to add a link at the bottom saying remove image. No confirmation/signup needed. Viola, instant delete.

Post reply on HN