Live data from Hacker News

What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

etherrotmutex.blogspot.com

121–130 of 176 posts

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#121
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is/was "solid rot" slang for something somewhere?

In my head it was just part of solid and rotation which was exactly that the code did and all I ever thought of, but once the other person pointed it out it was like "oh, right".

Yes but what's the "dirty" meaning? What were they pointing out? It's not aparrent.

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#122

Can anyone comment on the mindset of someone who creates a Blogspot for a single article? Is it anything beyond "I want to post this anonymously and have it hosted for free indefinitely"? It feels like an odd solution, but I also can't think of a better one.

Speculation:

The author found "ether-rot-mutex" amusing enough to start the blog and name it after the thing. They anticipated more posts in the future, but they didn't happen.

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#124
post #61

This brought me back to college and me learning about steganography. I wonder how many images are floating around with secret messages in them! Also reminds me of people who immortalized themselves by putting their initials or a favorite phrase in the header of a file format that got popular (like Mike did at Microsoft for .exe's; every exe header starts with MZ, which is really friggin cool) Or the "Don't Steal MacO…

On a tangent re: immortality: reminds me of the names you'd see in splash screens of various products. After one too many years of seeing “Seetharaman Narayanan” in the Photoshop splash screen, I just had to look him up.

https://www.ironicsans.com/2006/09/interview_seetharaman_nar...

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#125
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Meta is to Facebook what Alphabet is to Google. I don't think we have to worry.

Agree. Though, in my outsider perception Alphabet == Google + a bunch of failed stuff + self driving cars. Whereas Meta == Facebook + an absurd $$$$$ attempt to convince the public wearing headsets is revolutionary + forget about that whole destroying society thing. At least the self driving cars might have positive net impact. ;-)

+ DeepMind?

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#126
I’m utterly confused. The author argued he found that "comment" in a binary file. I assume it’s an executable compiled file of some sort.

Now, comments don’t end up inside compiled files right? This has to be a string, not a comment??

What am I missing?

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#127

I’m utterly confused. The author argued he found that "comment" in a binary file. I assume it’s an executable compiled file of some sort. Now, comments don’t end up inside compiled files right? This has to be a string, not a comment?? What am I missing?

It is probably an error message on a very unlikely failure path / assertion. Those sorts of messages are effectively just comments.

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#128
post #61

This brought me back to college and me learning about steganography. I wonder how many images are floating around with secret messages in them! Also reminds me of people who immortalized themselves by putting their initials or a favorite phrase in the header of a file format that got popular (like Mike did at Microsoft for .exe's; every exe header starts with MZ, which is really friggin cool) Or the "Don't Steal MacO…

I was REing my insulin pump's uploader at one point, and found that it would always send the phrase "all's well that ends well" to the server as part of the handshake

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#129
post #65
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm curious if they explicitly excluded their blog from Google search results, they don't seem to have the highest opinion of Google from various posts.

Doesn't look like it. I see 3 pages from the blog when I search site:frankiesjoint.blogspot.com . None of them are the post about ether-rot-mutex .

Ah, good point - and would seem unlikely they removed most pages except those.

Re: What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex (2017)

#130
post #61

This brought me back to college and me learning about steganography. I wonder how many images are floating around with secret messages in them! Also reminds me of people who immortalized themselves by putting their initials or a favorite phrase in the header of a file format that got popular (like Mike did at Microsoft for .exe's; every exe header starts with MZ, which is really friggin cool) Or the "Don't Steal MacO…

On a tangent re: immortality: reminds me of the names you'd see in splash screens of various products. After one too many years of seeing “Seetharaman Narayanan” in the Photoshop splash screen, I just had to look him up. https://www.ironicsans.com/2006/09/interview_seetharaman_nar...

I read the first sentence of your comment and I immediately thought of Photoshop. Good idea to have that splash screen, huh.
Post reply on HN