Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue is in the definition of "unborn human". Many people don't believe that something without a brain is considered to be a living human, in the same sense that people who are braindead but with a beating heart are considered dead. The question is, at what point in the unfertilized egg -> fertilized egg -> clump of cells -> developing fetus -> viable infant spectrum does the being take on "humanity"? Personally…
I’ve always thought it was odd that people feel like it’s a binary condition. It’s fine if the fetus is undelivered, or if it can’t live outside the womb, or ___. I’m pro-choice, but my opinion is that “choice” is always at least a little evil (barring medical or other specific reasons). The longer it goes on, the more evil it gets. To that end I think it’s insane that some states are pushing to have abortion be lega…
I've always been very skeptical of the moral arguments from the pro-life crowd in general though, since I can't fathom a morality that says that every child conceived must be born, but after that event it's better for that child to die in the streets of exposure or sickness or hunger than for any tax money to be spent to help it grow up healthy housed and fed.