Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pushing NATO expansion in Ukraine and arming them with hi-tech weaponry.
I think you forget that Ukraine has the right of agency and has the right to choose to join a defensive union. I'm also finding it hard to get any concrete examples of offensive actions by NATO. So far every single one seems to be okay with Russia (given they didn't veto it in the UN security council).
- There is still a Warsaw Pact.
- An Orange Revolution happens in Canada in 2014, backed by KGB neocon equivalents of Nuland/Graham.
- A Russia friendly regime is installed in Canada in 2014.
- Canada has regions with large U.S. populations.
- Canada keeps pushing for Warsaw Pact membership.
- At a security conference in Munich in 2022, Canada's Russia friendly prime minister mentions that he could acquire nuclear weapons.
Would you say that the U.S. would likely invade according to the Monroe doctrine? Or would you say that Canada has the right of agency?
None of this is excusing Russia, but disregarding these issues leads to escalation. I'm astonished that the NATO hardliners apparently think that their policies have been a success (they are of course a success if the goal was a proxy war that tests the strength of Russia's military in the first place).