Earlier quoted context omitted.
Author belongs to the special class of people who think sounding like a dick makes them more authoritative. All their posts are like that.
> class of people who think sounding like a dick makes them more authoritative It's a writing style. Like it or hate it. Nonetheless, criticisms of writing style are far too cheap and shallow for HN. Be better.
Obvious and possible software innovations
121–130 of 157 posts
Re: Obvious and possible software innovations
#122“He would be hailed as a Jobs-like technical innovator if he had some of his slaves do this, and he would be remembered with gratitude, rather than as the sperdo who dumped his wife for sexorz with lip filler Cthulhu.” Misogyny is really cool! Thanks Scott Locklin!
I give the guy credit for humor.
Re: Obvious and possible software innovations
#123If they're so easy and obvious, why hasn't the author done it, at least as a demo? The article also reeks of "this doesn't work for me, therefore it won't work for anyone" I doubt I'm the only one who absolutely does not concede that everything should have a GUI interface. "Why does shit like DPDK exist?" I don't know, but I bet you could find out with a little investigation, which might make this sound more like a w…
The author's about page reports that he is a former physicist with experience in automotives and law enforcement. It also contains the statement "I have a particular dislike of self-anointed 'experts';" with no apparent irony. And my personal favourite: "People may think I’m fighting above my weight class, because many of the people I label as clowns are on television and in important newspapers, much like the stars…
Re: Obvious and possible software innovations
#124Re: Point 4: I think C# Windows Forms are a great example of that (drag and drop GUI for creating GUI forms), and I wonder why no one is making things that easy in a cross-platform manner anymore!
Re: Obvious and possible software innovations
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are those building a GUI? Or just a website? As far as I know they’re mostly about markup.
That's a strange distinction to make. Websites are a type of GUIs. You can build some pretty complicated things without JavaScript, but if you need JS, then yes, most of them support it in some form or another, Plasmic probably being the most sophisticated.
Re: Obvious and possible software innovations
#126> Engineers are a defeated tribe; it’s cheaper to hire an “AI” (Alien or Immigrant) slave to write the terraform or electron front end rather than paying clever engineers well enough to build themselves useful tooling to make them more productive and the world a better place. Offensive passage that subtly implies immigrants from the developing world are slavish (and dehumanising them as well, using the word alien), i…
> I'm astonished that hordes of people are still ready to sell their first born if they can get a citizenship amid such a culture of passive racism and superiority complex. Can you imagine how bad it is where they come from?
Re: Obvious and possible software innovations
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The size of the final package is not very important You can only install so many packages with this philosophy before size starts to be important after. More to the point, you can only run a few of them at a time, on machines with gigabytes of RAM. This is a profound embarrassment to our industry. If by "responsive" you're referring to input latency, Electron apps are at best on par with native, usually worse IME.…
I can start building in React today, and style literally everything without really thinking about it. I can start with Qt5 today, and give up screaming in rage tomorrow because I can’t get my select dropdown to display what I want.
And be cursed into oblivion by the first user.
> I can start with Qt5 today, and give up screaming in rage tomorrow because I can’t get my select dropdown to display what I want.
File a bug report. Oh, i forgot, developers want to develop, not to fix bugs.
Re: Obvious and possible software innovations
#128> Cloud providers should admit they’re basically mainframes and write an operating system instead of the ad-hoc collection of horse shit they foist on developers. Oh I like this one so much. I love the era and idea of the mainframe. I caught the tail end of it in college. Our research professors would send their statistics jobs over to the mainframe and get the dot matrix printouts back showing what treatments showed…
> I just love the idea of one big central computer doing all the processing. And yet at the same time, having a super computer in my pocket is spectacularly cool!
Re: Obvious and possible software innovations
#129Front ends could be drag and drop native GUIs instead of electron apps We had Visual Basic. We had Dreamweaver. We had Microsoft FrontPage. What went wrong? Most web pages really aren't doing anything that exciting.
> We had Visual Basic. We had Dreamweaver. We had Microsoft FrontPage. What went wrong?
Visual basic was only used to run macros in Office documents. And then viruses. And then MS killed it. Dreamweaver ? Hello Adobe. Frontpage ? Was broken by design.
SW is only about inovations. It does not need to last. It must be new.
> Most web pages really aren't doing anything that exciting.
Data collection is a very exciting thing, so I heard.