Live data from Hacker News

NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

bbc.com

121–130 of 365 posts

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#121
post #35

All the extraterrestrial expansion, dream of Men to conquer Space, star track enterprise! I'm pessimistic that we will ever leave our solar system, and if so in 1000 years, I do not care. Hopefully people learn how tiny our bubble is and protect our environment more. The Martian environment looks so boring -- as a replacement for polluted Earth. (We will pollute Mars faster than Earth). I'm living at the ocean, tryin…

I admire your efforts to clean. But unfortunately it’s pointless. There are entire million and billion population countries that treat oceans as waste baskets, simply because they don’t know better. I’ve talked to fishermen in rural Thailand and they don’t have waste collection. So they take their trash every day and just dump it in the middle of the ocean somewhere. They didn’t understand why that was a problem when…

If one million people make a little effort the impact will be huge. Dont't be pessimistic. Lead by example. The simplified, minimalist, sustainable living style is contagious because it is as we are meant to actually live. In balance with the energy of the planet we depend upon and are part of.

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#123
post #87

Stupid question maybe but like is there a reason the picture quality seems worse than a decent dslr photo? I'm so curious what that photo would look like, taken with an everyday camera, without the bizarre 'scientific' look of these shots.

Scott Manley recently did a pretty good ELI5 on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wah1DbFVFiY

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#124
post #63
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I admire your efforts to clean. But unfortunately it’s pointless. There are entire million and billion population countries that treat oceans as waste baskets, simply because they don’t know better. I’ve talked to fishermen in rural Thailand and they don’t have waste collection. So they take their trash every day and just dump it in the middle of the ocean somewhere. They didn’t understand why that was a problem when…

One person doing something in the face of billions of others is the entire opposite of pointless. Giving up because you're one person and you can't magically transform the entire world is cynical, a cop-out and completely misunderstands the nature of the problem. The world won't change overnight, it won't immediately flip from the actions of one individual, or two, or even 1 thousand or 1 million. But that doesn't me…

It's not pointless, but I do think it's reasonable to question whether this is the best thing one can do to have an impact.

Could the time spent taking the neighbors trash away be spent doing something even more impactful?

Is the interaction with these neighbors caring and educative, or antagonistic? In the latter case they're unlikely to emulate it or pass on the idea to others.

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They use the same kind of compression as the last mission. JP2, I believe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_2000 I'm not sure that data compression has progressed that much since Curiosity in 2012 or Insight in 2018. There have been some formats that have improved compression at the expense of large amounts of memory or processing power, but neither of those are abundant on a rad-hardened processor. Neither is elec…

One of the obvious constraints is that for science reasons they transmit each image in a lossless format, so we're up against the limits of what a lossless image compressor can do. If there were a future mission's requirement to send back lossy images first, and CPU power was significant, something like AVIF or JPEG-XL would likely be a candidate. https://netflixtechblog.com/avif-for-next-generation-image-c... ICER a…

According to the graph on p.42, the 20 MHz CPU compresses at a rate of about 20us/pixel. So the 1024x1024 images take about 20 seconds each to compress.

There are 2,000 "normal" sized images on the website [0]. If each of these was 1024x1024, they took 11 hours to compress. So Perseverance spends about 7% of its CPU time on image compression.

[0] https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/multimedia/raw-images/

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#126
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> easily shielded by essentially any solid material If that shield fails for any reason, including tampering, you're looking at the radiological contamination and likely deaths of everyone nearby at the very least.

Alpha sources outside the human body are of little health concern. You'd have to break it open and eat the plutonium inside for it to be a serious risk.

> You'd have to break it open and eat the plutonium inside for it to be a serious risk.

Yes. Sounds like something a child would do.

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#127
post #103
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Economies of scale would surely change that though?

Plutonium was generated in reactors in the US but those were all shut down by the late 80s. It's not an easy thing to just mine or make more of there were whole reactors basically dedicated to just what we have left today. In fact we're kind of running out of the stuff for scientific missions, NASA only has enough for one RTG left according to reports. https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/pu50yc.html https://mjosefweber.…

The situation for Pu-238 production has improved since that was written https://www.ornl.gov/news/ornl-produced-plutonium-238-help-p...

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#128
post #35

All the extraterrestrial expansion, dream of Men to conquer Space, star track enterprise! I'm pessimistic that we will ever leave our solar system, and if so in 1000 years, I do not care. Hopefully people learn how tiny our bubble is and protect our environment more. The Martian environment looks so boring -- as a replacement for polluted Earth. (We will pollute Mars faster than Earth). I'm living at the ocean, tryin…

I admire your efforts to clean. But unfortunately it’s pointless. There are entire million and billion population countries that treat oceans as waste baskets, simply because they don’t know better. I’ve talked to fishermen in rural Thailand and they don’t have waste collection. So they take their trash every day and just dump it in the middle of the ocean somewhere. They didn’t understand why that was a problem when…

One rural fisherman's garbage production doesn't scale, though. A company owned by a handful of people can put out more pollution than that of millions of rural fishermen.

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#129
post #87

Stupid question maybe but like is there a reason the picture quality seems worse than a decent dslr photo? I'm so curious what that photo would look like, taken with an everyday camera, without the bizarre 'scientific' look of these shots.

speculation, but it's probably compressed before transmission to earth... for obvious reasons.

[deleted]

Re: NASA's Perseverance rover sends stunning images

#130
post #124
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One person doing something in the face of billions of others is the entire opposite of pointless. Giving up because you're one person and you can't magically transform the entire world is cynical, a cop-out and completely misunderstands the nature of the problem. The world won't change overnight, it won't immediately flip from the actions of one individual, or two, or even 1 thousand or 1 million. But that doesn't me…

It's not pointless, but I do think it's reasonable to question whether this is the best thing one can do to have an impact. Could the time spent taking the neighbors trash away be spent doing something even more impactful? Is the interaction with these neighbors caring and educative, or antagonistic? In the latter case they're unlikely to emulate it or pass on the idea to others.

It's not about doing the best thing, it's about doing something. You don't have to perfectly efficient, just take simple actions that reflect the change you want to see. We all have limited time and energy, if you see something positive you can do you shouldn't dismiss the idea of doing it just because you could sell all your belongings and become an eco-warrior and be maximally efficient in pursuing a positive development. Don't do nothing because you could be doing more. Just do what you can.

Do something good and do it consistently.

Post reply on HN