You can use Parabola-rM[1] with a reMarkable 1 tablet as an all-in-one solution, and like the T480 can be totally freedom-respecting using only libre software. [1]: http://www.davisr.me/projects/parabola-rm/
Building an E-Ink Laptop
121–130 of 160 posts
Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#122Ha, this is a good write-up on a very interesting topic I’ve been thinking about a lot myself recently. The setup I’ve been thinking of putting together is similar, except I’ve been wanting to pair an e-ink monitor with something like a Raspberry Pi 400 ( https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-400 ) for a kind of deliberately-slow, ultra-low-wattage dev and writing environment. End result would be extremel…
Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
> if a company holds patents on a technology, other companies can't improve the same technology You're making a claim equivalent to saying Microsoft holds patents on operating system technologies, other companies can't improve the same technology. I'm guessing you're not actually involved in the display industry because you chose not to reply with a clearly defined specific problem that is blocked by patents. I actua…
> You're making a claim equivalent to saying Microsoft holds patents on operating system technologies, other companies can't improve the same technology. No, I'm stating the fact that other companies can't improve the same exact technology (as defined in the patent). If Microsoft has patents on aspects X, Y, Z of filesystems, other companies can still make filesystems, even improved ones. But they can't make a filesy…
That's equivalent to saying Samsung can't improve the same exact technology used by AU Optronics. Rightfully so.
> So this isn't about other companies still being able to make improved eg. OSes in the general sense, but if they can build improved OSes that also leverage the same patented techniques where needed (and they can't)
I think I've explained my point clearly enough. I'll wait for you to give some factual evidence as to which patent you believe is giving rise to your statement of "they can't".
Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#124Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#125Hey folks, I've recently had the idea of building an e-ink laptop from the devices I had at home. I decided to document the process and share each step of the way: Some of the posts planned for the series are: Dasung Paperlike HD-FT teardown, Thinkpad T480 teardown, Creating the prototype, Installing and configuring NixOS, M-x e-ink-laptop-mode If you have any questions or comments, feel free to reach out.
I did a screen conversion on a thinkpad t430s which I still have (not Eink, just a better LCD). Do you know of any 16:9 eink displays that take eDP as input? Or anything that would fit in a 14” chassis?
Just beginning to get into the eink world so some direction would be super helpful. Would definitely be up for swapping one into my thinkpad.
Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is bistability in this context? Confidence that the ink will rest in 'on' or 'off' configurations? How does that relate to greyscale with multiple configurations and how does ClearInk manage pixel state?
Clearink does not rely on the foreground pigment particles coming to "rest" at a fixed position relative to the background pigment, ie: achieving a stable state. Instead they rely on driving the field for as long as the foreground is needed. As soon as it decays, the background pigment instantly rises back to the internally reflecting top plane. This allows the display to achieve much faster speeds since the pigments…
Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You're making a claim equivalent to saying Microsoft holds patents on operating system technologies, other companies can't improve the same technology. No, I'm stating the fact that other companies can't improve the same exact technology (as defined in the patent). If Microsoft has patents on aspects X, Y, Z of filesystems, other companies can still make filesystems, even improved ones. But they can't make a filesy…
> I'm stating the fact that other companies can't improve the same exact technology (as defined in the patent). That's equivalent to saying Samsung can't improve the same exact technology used by AU Optronics. Rightfully so. > So this isn't about other companies still being able to make improved eg. OSes in the general sense, but if they can build improved OSes that also leverage the same patented techniques where ne…
Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#128Lenovo had a dual screen botebook with e-ink https://www.engadget.com/lenovo-thinkbook-plus-gen-2-i-e-ink...
Yes, but the e-ink screen was on the wrong side of the device. People like me and the author need an e-ink display for writing in broad sunlight.
Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#129But it was fun to write in direct sunlight, in just a slightly less of a hipster fashion than using i.e. https://getfreewrite.com/ :D
Re: Building an E-Ink Laptop
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
Clearink does not rely on the foreground pigment particles coming to "rest" at a fixed position relative to the background pigment, ie: achieving a stable state. Instead they rely on driving the field for as long as the foreground is needed. As soon as it decays, the background pigment instantly rises back to the internally reflecting top plane. This allows the display to achieve much faster speeds since the pigments…
From what this description sounds like, the foreground pigment would only remain at the forefront so long as a charge was applied. Doesn't this defeat the energy savings of eInk in that once you have updated the display it doesn't cost anything to hold its image?