Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it? The article indicates at least some of this comes from merely incrementing an integer in the video URLs. > I am now crawling URLs of all videos uploaded to Parler. Sequentially from latest to oldest. VIDXXX.txt files coming up, 50k chunks, there will be 1.1M URLs total...
People have been sent to prison before for nothing more than fetching publicly available web pages by incrementing numbers in a URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weev
70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
121–130 of 1001 posts
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wikileaks leaked John Podesta's emails, including such criminal activity as his recipe for risotto.
It's generally a good idea for leakers to be selective about their releases (Snowden did a better job than Manning in that area IMO). I guess Wikileaks is between a rock and a hard place, because if they started editorializing then that would lead to political bias.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#123Could these "Researchers" be prosecuted under CFAA? Purposely accessing information known to be private? EDIT: accidently wrote DMCA
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#124This story truly terrifies me: my team owns my company's sign up page. (I speak for myself and not them, of course). Sounds like Parler, fearing that their OTP provider might go down, decided to fail-open, ie: if the dependency throws an exception, presume there's something wrong with the dependency and that the code provided is acceptable. It never occurred to them that the dependency could be down permanently, or t…
Take your lazy dicksucking elsewhere. Suggestion: Go back to reddit.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
The ramifications of this will absolutely set a record for the future as the inevitable reverse will happen. People are forgetting that if they're ok with this sort of behavior now, it'll be difficult for them to argue-against or prevent the same behavior when their opposites are in control.
They are betting everything on the belief that they will win permanently this time, and their opponents will never get control again.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#126When you purposefully leak private data, you no longer get to hide behind the title "Security Researcher".
If I were sitting on a dataset like this, I'd probably try to share it with the authorities like the FBI and selected journalists who I feel would behave responsibly.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
People have been sent to prison before for nothing more than fetching publicly available web pages by incrementing numbers in a URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weev
I don't know how it works "over there", but where I'm from "URL-hacking" is not considered hacking, but data publicly available.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#128While I understand that Twilio is probably not at fault for the actual leak, I'm curious if they gave Parler some time to migrate/shift before cutting them off from their services. It's easy not to care since Parler is the "bad guy" here, but I do think that Internet infrastructure companies need to give a reasonable heads-up before pulling the rug under business customers.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#129When you purposefully leak private data, you no longer get to hide behind the title "Security Researcher".
On the other hand if an actual researcher leaks data they're still a researcher; they might be a bad person, but that's orthogonal.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
As I'm reading it, Twilio simply shut down the account, Parler is the one who reacted to that by assuming everything is authenticated if the API doesn't work.
Seems implausible. Why would anyone design a system that way. I suspect it must be a more complicated combination of circumstances as it often is.
Because they knew that, being a save haven for violent white supremacists, it was likely one or more of their service providers would terminate service and wanted to continue to operate despite any termination.