Linux runs better on both new and older hardware. Better as in programs open faster, the file manager opens faster, the task manager opens faster. Everything uses less memory and less CPU cycles. Everything is snappier. Linux users don't have to worry nearly as much about malware, trojans, viruses, exploits. It's more secure. Linux distros generally don't annoy users with stealthy automatic forced updates. Linux dist…
> Linux runs better on both new and older hardware. Better as in programs open faster, the file manager opens faster, the task manager opens faster. Everything uses less memory and less CPU cycles. Everything is snappier. Unless "hardware" is many laptops or all tablets, which effectively can't run Linux (unless Android etc.)
Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
121–130 of 636 posts
Re: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#122I know quite a lot of folks here are fed up with moves away from native apps and towards Electron-wrapped web apps (and often for totally valid reasons) but it's been a godsend for making Linux a usable daily driver OS. IMO if you're doing eg web dev work in a GSuite / Slack / Figma / etc organization, it's never been a better time to try desktop Linux!
Why do you need web apps wrapped in their own window, though? Just open a browser. Relatedly, Electron is a problem because desktop apps nowadays require a huge browser just to display a window, not because web apps are packaged in a browser to get slightly better desktop integration.
works offline
has more permissions
can use udp
separate alt-tab, tray display
is not throttled because it's in the background (on desktop)
unaffected by browser settings
unaffected by clear cookies
unaffected by extensions
less confusion over who handles keybindsRe: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#123Only some games and ableton live are missing from some platforms.
Re: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#124Linux updates dont force themselves on my machine and brick it once it reboots.
Did this happen to you, or is this an urban legend?
You could argue the Windows issue is the fault of Samsung's migration assistant or the OS X issue was the fault of my employer's mdm software as both ultimately boiled down a partition layout that the updater wasn't anticipating, but OS X was unable to rollback and Windows _did_ rollback, but then immediately tried again with reapplying the update and restarting as it was past the "No really we're just going to update to the new feature release now" period.
Re: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#125None of these reasons have anything to do with user experience -- no wonder none of these reasons have earned Linux any market share outside of picky developers.
* Astronomically lower probability of catching a virus. * No bullshit forced updates when the OS feels like it. * No phoning home with you being unable to launch an app when your manufacturer's server is slow. * No shuffling about trying to install drivers for a thousand components before your computer is usable. How's that?
Re: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#126Re: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#127Re: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#128Re: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly I'd suggest they just use Qt then. Our company is writing a portable replacement to our Electron client right now. The electron option was absolute garbage, very limited, and caused us untold pain. We got tired of telling customers "we can't really do that". The Qt version is already working on Linux and Windows, and on whatever CPUs we compile it for. There's no excuse for Electron, because there are good,…
Qt is nice but costs money for developers of proprietary software. Electron has its own costs but most of them are externalized to the user. So it wins out.
Re: Reasons to prefer Linux over Windows (2014)
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly I'd suggest they just use Qt then. Our company is writing a portable replacement to our Electron client right now. The electron option was absolute garbage, very limited, and caused us untold pain. We got tired of telling customers "we can't really do that". The Qt version is already working on Linux and Windows, and on whatever CPUs we compile it for. There's no excuse for Electron, because there are good,…
Qt is nice but costs money for developers of proprietary software. Electron has its own costs but most of them are externalized to the user. So it wins out.