Live data from Hacker News

How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

by.graffino.com

121–130 of 131 posts

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#121

As a user paying extra for google storage the constant flow of stories of people having issues with google and nobody to contact scare me. What happens if I loose access to my account and loose gmail/photos/drive. What do people use to backup Google?

I have an automated Google Takeout > AWS Glacier workflow. I'm trying to de-google myself as much as possible though.

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#122
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox already has a similar restriction on Windows, and I think MacOS, but not Linux. On the normal version of firefox for those platforms you can't permanently sideload an extension, you need to reload it on each restart. The Developer Edition still lets you sideload addons normally, however.

> On the normal version of firefox for those platforms you can't permanently sideload an extension ... Are you sure about that? I am using Firefox on Windows and I currently have no problem sideloading extensions. They stay enabled and even update automatically. Try, for example, installing this [1] bypass paywall extension via the "Download and install the latest version" link. Works flawless. ... or am I getting so…

It looks like this is happening because the bypass paywall extension is still signed by mozilla, but not distributed through their normal addon website, which I just now learned is possible.

Still not great, but it is good to learn that it is just a little less restrictive than I thought.

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#123
post #59

It's really disappointing for me to hear this, considering that I have been releasing chrome extensions for the past year. [1,2,3] One thing I've noticed is that Chrome's extension search is absolute garbage, and even typing the exact name of my extensions, for example "Wikipedia Section Links" [3], doesn't yield my extension, not even on the first page, and the second page is rather hidden and not obvious. Pretty te…

You would think a Google project like Google Chrome would benefit from Google Search.

Indeed. Here are the relevant links by the way:

Chrome extension search: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/search/wikipedia%20links

Extension page: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/wikipedia-links/mn...

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#124
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not quite that scary. They're removing content that the site operator explicitly made unavailable to mobile phones. Old pre-mobile sites will be fine. I would direct the "fuck that shit" to those websites that actively decide to give mobile users less information, lower resolution images (even when you zoom in @&@#!), text that goes off the screen while scrolling is disabled, so you can never see it, etc.

> Old pre-mobile sites will be fine Who can guarantee this? What are the criteria that Google uses to determine "the site operator made the site explicitly unavailable to mobile phones"? > those websites that actively decide to give mobile users lower resolution images Mobile internet is a joke even in developed countries such as Germany, and data caps on mobile are absurdly low . It's annoying that zoom does not wor…

They crawl it with a phone bot so they won't collect things that aren't provided to phone users. Old fashioned HTML+CSS works on phones. It might not be a good size but at least it's all there. I guess it doesn't matter if the search results show a mobile-resolution image. You can still click through to the site to see the desktop resolution version.

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#125

As a user paying extra for google storage the constant flow of stories of people having issues with google and nobody to contact scare me. What happens if I loose access to my account and loose gmail/photos/drive. What do people use to backup Google?

Yeah, it scares me too. I am considering moving to Next Cloud, but for now I am using spanning.com to backup Google drive.

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#126
post #65

In the final update post[0] the author says There isn’t any option left to circumvent the Chrome Store. Starting with Chrome 53, extensions cannot be side-loaded anymore. Is it possible that Firefox will undergo such a restriction in the future? [0] https://graffino.com/web-development/after-my-post-went-vira...

>Starting with Chrome 53, extensions cannot be side-loaded anymore

    Source
    Unpacked extension
    Loaded from: ~\AppData\Local\Vivaldi\User Data\Default\Extensions\...

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#127

As a user paying extra for google storage the constant flow of stories of people having issues with google and nobody to contact scare me. What happens if I loose access to my account and loose gmail/photos/drive. What do people use to backup Google?

I back it all up from google takeout every now and then.

https://takeout.google.com/settings/takeout

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, apis with multiple non-browser native clients? Basically the current app model, but decoupling the owners of the client ant the api? I think it could work, but you'd probably have to mix ads directly into the return values for it to be at all profitable. Then again, if clients are one time download, and the owner of the api doesn't have to deliver 5-10 meg of JS every single time, you might be able to get away wi…

currently the web doesn't let you mix data from sites very easily. Like maybe I want to cross reference my google calendar with my bank spendings on a particular day or something. We also get stuck with crappy UIs all the time (often from banks in particular). Dunno about how ads would work if sites just provided data, but I can imagine an intermediate step where we have a tool that can real time scrape a site for on…

I'd be happy with just no autoplaying videos and no messing with my scrollbars. Oh, and no popups or popunders.

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#129
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not worried that Amazon would shut down all of AWS any time soon. Can you honestly say it would be a complete surprise, however, if Google announced an EOL for GCP?

Yes. I can honestly say this would be extremely surprising given the tenants, and the rate of change of the core kubernetes model. I do not believe the dead products list typically has either this paying customer base, or code change.

Who are the notable GCP tenants? Just curious.

Tbh, the only reason I use GCP is Firebase, and the only reason I use Firebase is because it's usable for my (limited) purposes in a neat format. I'm currently in the process of migrating some functions to AWS, but it's so clunky, almost 2005-esque.

Re: How Google obliterated my 4 year old Chrome extension with 24k+ users (2016)

#130
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. I can honestly say this would be extremely surprising given the tenants, and the rate of change of the core kubernetes model. I do not believe the dead products list typically has either this paying customer base, or code change.

Who are the notable GCP tenants? Just curious. Tbh, the only reason I use GCP is Firebase, and the only reason I use Firebase is because it's usable for my (limited) purposes in a neat format. I'm currently in the process of migrating some functions to AWS, but it's so clunky, almost 2005-esque.

https://cloud.google.com/customers
Post reply on HN