The problem with Matrix is their focus on Electron-based client. Official native client would have been better .
I don't mean to sound stuffy when i say that the beauty of open source is that you are free to build a better alternative...but it is true. Either you can build a better thing that you want, or you can pay someone to do so, etc. That being said, there are existing native clients already. May i direct your attention to: https://www.matrix.org/clients/
Gitter is joining Matrix
121–124 of 124 posts
Re: Gitter is joining Matrix
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd be happy with a transcript. Much faster to read than listen.
Is there a transcript?
Re: Gitter is joining Matrix
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't mean to sound stuffy when i say that the beauty of open source is that you are free to build a better alternative...but it is true. Either you can build a better thing that you want, or you can pay someone to do so, etc. That being said, there are existing native clients already. May i direct your attention to: https://www.matrix.org/clients/
I am aware of native clients. Due to being unofficial they often get abandoned and two years ago the list looked differently. What I am talking about is that something simple as chat application should not take gigabyte of memory and incorporate a whole web-browser underneath.