Live data from Hacker News

Fawkes: Image “Cloaking” for Personal Privacy

sandlab.cs.uchicago.edu

121–122 of 122 posts

Re: Fawkes: Image “Cloaking” for Personal Privacy

#121
post #3

I was immediately was curious how it would protect against image compression and/or otherwise de-noising these protection pixel changes. Their paper does address this question, and for those that are interested: Even image compression cannot defeat our cloak. We use progressive JPEG [57], reportedly used by Facebook and Twitter, to compress the images in our dataset. The image quality, as standard by Independent JPEG…

How about a 1px Gaussian blur? Haven't read the paper but I had the same thought. Seems way too tenuous.

You don't even have to read the paper, it's in the FAQs: "Can't you just apply some filter, or compression, or blurring algorithm, or add some noise to the image to destroy image cloaks?"

Short answer: No not really. Long answer: Look at the FAQs :)

Re: Fawkes: Image “Cloaking” for Personal Privacy

#122
post #68

Looks like it is obfuscating asymmetry. In addition to the intended effect it could also make people more attractive.

Finally a comment that addresses how the cloaking works. All the other comments I've seen here wonder how pixel-level changes can prevent recognition. Well, shifting an eye a few millimeters changes the whole face!

They cloaked versions look like different people to me (except for the last). I’m more surprised by nobody mentioning this! They look like relatives, but not the same person.
Post reply on HN