Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nortel was not killed by Huawei or a hack. It was killed by bad management. The article tries to paint the picture of a fantastic company but that was not the case. It was mismanaged (and the article provides some glaring examples, including fraud), slow, bloated, it was really struggling in the cellular space. Even the account of the hack shows how badly Nortel handled it. There's always the temptation to find an ex…
The same happened to Nokia. People usually say that Microsoft killed it, but it was already pretty much behind everything when Microsoft took it. Too much bureaucracy, everything outsourced, management out of touch with anything, meetings after meetings... Hell, I remember two/three weeks of meetings to replace apache proxy with nginx. Actual replacement and configuration update would take a couple of minutes.
Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
121–130 of 137 posts
Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not going to argue your point about products, but from a financial standpoint, RIMM/Blackberry's peak market cap was about $81 billion in 2008. Nortel's peak was $283 billion in 2000. Nortel was huge. Of course, the market was in a huge bubble at the time.
Nortel also got a bit larger than RIM by sales. Nortel's peak was $22.2 billion in fiscal year 2000, with $1.7b in operating income. RIM peaked at $19.9 billion in sales in 2011. Amazingly they tripled in size from $6b in sales in 2008, in just three years. Then lost 85% of their sales in another four years after that.
I assume this is due to the advent of touchscreen phones. Around when people were getting used to the idea that mobile phones could be used for more than just making calls, touchscreens could be buggy/laggy and there wasn't haptic feedback or any sort of attempt at recreating the physical sensation of typing. RIM doubled down on physical keyboards, and Blackberrys had great ones (I could type much faster on my Blackberry Bold than on an iPhone at the time) and they already had productivity/utility apps and such since they were really PDAs. But the gradually improving touchscreen typing experience, combined with the increased utility of being able to put the keyboard away when you didn't need it, spelled the death of physical keyboard phones not long after.
Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kelley Johnson’s Skunk Works was successful because it rejected government controls and oversight. Read Kelley’s 14 rules of Management. Johnson had a 15th rule that he passed on by word of mouth. According to the book "Skunk Works" the 15th rule is: "Starve before doing business with the damned Navy.“ because the Navy wouldn’t relinquish control of projects to the Skunkworks. And it’s “funding” was paid contracts fo…
You're crossing streams here. Government backed financing for equipment sales, and government procurement for defence or large projects ... these are activities are miles apart in terms of operational realities. The Chinese government is involved to this day in financing Huawei customers. This is a big 'no no' for supposedly 'free trade' because it's a huge strategic advantage for any competitor wishing to completely…
I don't know, export finance is a tool used by many countries, the U.S included.
Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#124My parents lost a small fortune in 2001 riding the tech crash down (Nortel was a good chunk of that). I've been trying to explain to them (1st gen Chinese immigrants) for the past three years that Nortel was killed partly by focused Chinese spying and IP-theft by Huawei. CSIS has know about this for years. They (my parents) just wouldn't believe it until I showed them this article. Their former university classmates…
For those of us of Mediterranean decent, it would be as if the Roman Empire has been rebuilt and were expanding its influence globally. It would be hard for most people not to feel some element of subconscious or conscious pride.
The same feelings helped prop up the new Caliphate in the middle east recently (until it became obvious how brutal ISIS was).
Everyone wants to be part of something bigger than themselves.
Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#125Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're crossing streams here. Government backed financing for equipment sales, and government procurement for defence or large projects ... these are activities are miles apart in terms of operational realities. The Chinese government is involved to this day in financing Huawei customers. This is a big 'no no' for supposedly 'free trade' because it's a huge strategic advantage for any competitor wishing to completely…
>> The Chinese government is involved to this day in financing Huawei customers. This is a big 'no no' for supposedly 'free trade' I don't know, export finance is a tool used by many countries, the U.S included.
However, it's not the same thing.
Imagine if Trump Directed the Fed to print money to give to Chase Bank, to lend money to TMobile Germany to buy gear from Cisco. This would be incomprehensible to us.
So it's all a game, we need to play accordingly.
Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#127Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
Too big to fail works when there's a network effect that locks your customers into you. VISA is an example of that. Reputation-based businesses (Think auditing firms) are another. Facebook is a third. On the other hand, a vendor like Nortell did not have network lockin on their customers. They could, and did end up switching vendors.
"Switching", get it?
Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#129Was the super-micro story linked bottom of the article substantiated in any way in the two years that passed since Bloomberg published it ?
Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?
#130My parents lost a small fortune in 2001 riding the tech crash down (Nortel was a good chunk of that). I've been trying to explain to them (1st gen Chinese immigrants) for the past three years that Nortel was killed partly by focused Chinese spying and IP-theft by Huawei. CSIS has know about this for years. They (my parents) just wouldn't believe it until I showed them this article. Their former university classmates…
Huawei hacks are the sideshow, the burning tire fire of management is the main act.
Your parents aren't the only ones burnt by Nortel. Lots of Nortel employees indulged with the paper gains of their stock, only for it to crater and created lots of financial strain.
But like most articles with a question as the title, the answer is typically no. This article, frankly, is trying so hard to rewrite history, to divert attention from the main act to the side show.