Live data from Hacker News

Typing inside of the default WSL terminal feels amazing (2018)

github.com

121–123 of 123 posts

Re: Typing inside of the default WSL terminal feels amazing (2018)

#121
post #81

Anyone else notice that typing directly on the tty is much faster than in a terminal emulator in X11?

Yes, without exception. It's less noticeable on today's powerful systems, but it's still true. Text mode is just faster than graphics mode, at least on any system where I've used both.

Re: Typing inside of the default WSL terminal feels amazing (2018)

#122
post #118
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Alacritty has kind of a lot of input latency, it's noticeably worse than wsltty and the default WSL terminal -- at least back when I checked it a year ago. I think some work has been done to improve it, but at this point IMO if you're on Windows then wsltty is as good as it gets for a general purpose terminal. If you're on Linux, xterm is top notch.

I don't know, I've got two panes here opened next to each other (tiled/xmonad) with xterm and alacritty, and I've been typing in those for the last 5min, and I really can't tell the difference (my monitor has 5ms latency).

Does it have 5ms response time or "input lag" because both are very very different and input lag isn't a spec you'll find on the box.

You typically need special hardware to measure it, or find review sites that go out of their way to cover it.

Re: Typing inside of the default WSL terminal feels amazing (2018)

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another vote for low-latency here. It’s tempting to create a YouTube channel dedicated to showing input latencies for common tasks. Question is: how do you make sure no one is cheating?

Use a measurement device and show it in the video. Like the 1000fps camera used in https://danluu.com/input-lag/

Where this would be really transformative is if anyone could submit a video and have it verified. If they set up their own slo-mo capture they could just as easily record a sped-up screen capture.

There's definitely a way out by requiring that the tests are reproducible in a 'lab', but that throws out results from machines the lab doesn't have access to

Post reply on HN