Live data from Hacker News

It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

krebsonsecurity.com

121–130 of 184 posts

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#121
post #17

> A review of the Top 10 most populous U.S. cities indicates only half of them have obtained .gov domains, including Chicago, Dallas, Phoenix, San Antonio, and San Diego. > Yes, you read that right: houston.gov, losangeles.gov, newyorkcity.gov, and philadelphia.gov are all still available. As is the .gov for San Jose, Calif., the economic, cultural and political center of Silicon Valley. A minor nit: Many of these ci…

My township (step below city) has a .com domain.

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#122
post #17

> A review of the Top 10 most populous U.S. cities indicates only half of them have obtained .gov domains, including Chicago, Dallas, Phoenix, San Antonio, and San Diego. > Yes, you read that right: houston.gov, losangeles.gov, newyorkcity.gov, and philadelphia.gov are all still available. As is the .gov for San Jose, Calif., the economic, cultural and political center of Silicon Valley. A minor nit: Many of these ci…

My township (step below city) has a .com domain.

Is moldbug your mayor/ceo?

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#123
post #93

Good reporting, until this paragraph: Now consider what a well-funded adversary could do on Election Day armed with a handful of .gov domains for some major cities in Democrat strongholds within key swing states: The attackers register their domains a few days in advance of the election, and then on Election Day send out emails signed by .gov from, say, miami.gov (also still available) informing residents that bombs…

Well, yes and no. Yes - he could've chosen not to name a party at all and the point would have stood. However it's not simply a matter of opinion to suggest that the Republican party attempt nefarious electoral tricks to discourage (or outright ban) people from voting. It's now pretty much party policy.

Exactly. The problem with "both sides" reasoning is that often times it really is only one side to any meaningful degree.

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#124
post #102
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be shocking, though, if it turned out that Russia was the only country trying to influence US elections, though, instead of the only one that has been publically exposed.

Yet, with an exception of Iran, the countries with most aggressive foreign policies (Russia, China, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey) seem to currently support the election of Republican nominees.

Only certain republicans though

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#125
post #76

Does anybody know why the USA hogs the toplevel domain? It's not the only government in the world. It would seem more just to make it more like .com than .edu.

Nope, .gov belongs to the US, so they get to hog it.

It's a historical vestige, the Internet started out as a U.S. government-sponsored research network, so they built it for their own needs. There's absolutely no reason to them to give that up.

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#126

Good reporting, until this paragraph: Now consider what a well-funded adversary could do on Election Day armed with a handful of .gov domains for some major cities in Democrat strongholds within key swing states: The attackers register their domains a few days in advance of the election, and then on Election Day send out emails signed by .gov from, say, miami.gov (also still available) informing residents that bombs…

Democrats _want_ people to vote, most voter registration drives and voter services (offering transportation to a polling place, etc) are run by Democrats or aligned organizations.

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#127
post #56

This is what I used to do back in the day, to get high pagerank(remember that?) In Google

You used to defraud the US Government back in the day? For pagerank? Did you get in trouble?

It was more .edu's back then, I came across more than one (presumably hacked) professors personal sites that where hosting link spam directories

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#128

Tangent. This guy has the best and probably most read blog on cybersecurity incidents. He's smart enough to serve ads from his own domain but can't even bother to make his site mobile friendly? I've seen people pick on the sites of free tools and side projects for the same reason but somehow this gets a pass.

Well, it loads instantly and I can read it just fine on my mobile device, which is more than I can say for half of "mobile friendly" sites out there, so there's that...

Anyway, he mentioned about a year ago that he knows the design of his blog is outdated, and he was looking at making it more modern.

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#129
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Norway, people employed by the local municipalities have email adresses that are literally of the style $firstname[.$middlename].$lastname@employee.$municipalityName.municipality.no where "employee" and "municipality" are literal strings (in Norwegian) and the others are variables. It's incredible, I've seen people with 50 character long email addresses.

Why is that incredible? It is pretty common for many institutions to have that kind of email. Universities for instance often have similar emails so that just by looking at the email you know if the person is a teacher / student / temp worker and which chair they belong to, sometimes which campus in addition. Many big companies have similar things to identify the BU of the email holder or indicate a contractor status…

Some unis. I had the three letter username (helps my name starts with W) at Berkeley. You could pick anything you wanted.

Re: It's Way Too Easy to Get a .gov Domain Name

#130
post #17

> A review of the Top 10 most populous U.S. cities indicates only half of them have obtained .gov domains, including Chicago, Dallas, Phoenix, San Antonio, and San Diego. > Yes, you read that right: houston.gov, losangeles.gov, newyorkcity.gov, and philadelphia.gov are all still available. As is the .gov for San Jose, Calif., the economic, cultural and political center of Silicon Valley. A minor nit: Many of these ci…

I would assume the LA City one was chosen because it’s still shorter than Los Angeles and it also differentiates from LA County. Much of the LA metropolitan area is within the county limits but not part of the city of LA.

Could be also because they have lots of Spanish speakers? La ciudad == the city, Spanglish la city, :)
Post reply on HN