Earlier quoted context omitted.
WTF are you reading? I said that the fact that Snowden can be used as an example is evidence of him accomplishing something. Explicitely to argue against the position that he hasn't accomplished anything. I am in no way arguing that he didn't accomplish anything more . >Would that be worth ruining your life? I'm asking for your perspective. Would what be worth ruining my life for? Obviously one doesn't make such pers…
> I said that the fact that Snowden can be used as an example is evidence of him accomplishing something. How is it evidence of anything more than his fame? It's very counter-intuitive that being brought up as an example of an unaccomplished person is evidence of accomplishment. I don't see how that works. If you want to argue in favor of Snowden having accomplished something important, point out his accomplishments.…
Your argument is predicated on a category error.