Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Then why do you ask me? Because from my perspective it seems like you had an opinion and then you backed away once I challenged it. You dance around it enough to pretend that the author didn't make a clear opinion. > I only mentioned one aspect (a question, not a conclusion by the way) It sounded rhetorical. Like with other religious wars, we can agree to disagree. From my perspective, I still feel that your origin…
> Because from my perspective it seems like you had an opinion and then you backed away once I challenged it. From my perspective you made a mistake and now you're too proud to admit it. What you "feel" I meant is wrong. I didn't even make a point. And I explicitly told you what I meant! Interesting that you're now framing this as a "religious war". What I think is less interesting is that I have to defend myself aga…
Here's the anatomy of your initial comment:
1. Statement and rhetorical question echoing the article's main message
2. A conclusion using a summary of the article. The article only has one main conclusion.
Was that comment not an opinion or are you making comments that article summary bots make? Forgive me for making an incorrect assumption.